Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct;92(10):2193-2199.
doi: 10.1002/jmv.26005. Epub 2020 Jul 21.

Evaluating the efficiency of specimen pooling for PCR-based detection of COVID-19

Affiliations

Evaluating the efficiency of specimen pooling for PCR-based detection of COVID-19

Supaporn Wacharapluesadee et al. J Med Virol. 2020 Oct.

Abstract

In the age of a pandemic, such as the ongoing one caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the world faces a limited supply of tests, personal protective equipment, and factories and supply chains are struggling to meet the growing demands. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of specimen pooling for testing of SARS-CoV-2 virus, to determine whether costs and resource savings could be achieved without impacting the sensitivity of the testing. Ten previously tested nasopharyngeal and throat swab specimens by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR), were pooled for testing, containing either one or two known positive specimens of varying viral concentrations. Specimen pooling did not affect the sensitivity of detecting SARS-CoV-2 when the PCR cycle threshold (Ct) of original specimen was lower than 35. In specimens with low viral load (Ct > 35), 2 of 15 pools (13.3%) were false negative. Pooling specimens to test for Coronavirus Disease 2019 infection in low prevalence (≤1%) areas or in low risk populations can dramatically decrease the resource burden on laboratory operations by up to 80%. This paves the way for large-scale population screening, allowing for assured policy decisions by governmental bodies to ease lockdown restrictions in areas with a low incidence of infection, or with lower-risk populations.

Keywords: COVID-19; PCR; SARS-CoV-2; cost efficiency; real-time PCR; specimen pooling.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Illustrates the experimental design of the pooling strategies tested in this study

References

    1. Tanne JH, Hayasaki E, Zastrow M, Pulla P, Smith P, Rada AG. Covid‐19: how doctors and healthcare systems are tackling coronavirus worldwide. BMJ. 2020;368:m1090. 10.1136/bmj.m1090 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Emanuel EJ, Persad G, Upshur R, et al. Fair allocation of scarce medical resources in the time of Covid‐19. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(21):2049–2055. 10.1056/NEJMsb2005114 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cohen J, Kupferschmidt K. Countries test tactics in ‘war'against COVID‐19. Science. 2020;367(6484):1287‐1288. 10.1126/science.367.6484.1287 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hogan CA, Sahoo MK, Pinsky BA. Sample pooling as a strategy to detect community transmission of SARS‐CoV‐2. JAMA. 2020;323(19):1967–1969. 10.1001/jama.2020.5445 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stramer SL, Glynn SA, Kleinman SH, et al. Detection of HIV‐1 and HCV infections among antibody‐negative blood donors by nucleic acid–amplification testing. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(8):760‐768. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms