Psychometric testing of the Fall Risks for Older People in the Community screening tool (FROP-Com screen) for community-dwelling people with stroke
- PMID: 32401819
- PMCID: PMC7219754
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233045
Psychometric testing of the Fall Risks for Older People in the Community screening tool (FROP-Com screen) for community-dwelling people with stroke
Abstract
Objective: The Falls Risk for Older People in the Community assessment (FROP-Com) was originally developed using 13 risk factors to identify the fall risks of community-dwelling older people. To suit the practical use in busy clinical settings, a brief version adopting 3 most fall predictive risk factors from the original FROP-Com, including the number of falls in the past 12 months, assistance required to perform domestic activities of daily living and observation of balance, was developed for screening purpose (FROP-Com screen). The objectives of this study were to investigate the inter-rater and test-retest reliability, concurrent and convergent validity, and minimum detectable change of the FROP-Com screen in community-dwelling people with stroke.
Participants: Community-dwelling people with stroke (n = 48) were recruited from a local self-help group, and community-dwelling older people (n = 40) were recruited as control subjects.
Results: The FROP-Com screen exhibited moderate inter-rater (Intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]2,1 = 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65-0.87) and test-retest reliability (ICC3,1 = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.46-0.83) and weak associations with two balance measures, the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) (rho = -0.38, p = 0.008) and the Timed "Up & Go" (TUG) test (rho = 0.35, p = 0.016). The screen also exhibited a moderate association with the Chinese version of the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC-C) (ABC-C; rho = -0.65, p<0.001), a measure of subjective balance confidence.
Conclusions: The FROP-Com screen is a reliable clinical tool with convergent validity paralleled with subjective balance confidence measure that can be used in fall risk screening of community-dwelling people with stroke. However, one individual item, the observation of balance, will require additional refinement to improve the potential measurement error.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Similar articles
-
The reliability and predictive accuracy of the falls risk for older people in the community assessment (FROP-Com) tool.Age Ageing. 2008 Nov;37(6):634-9. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afn129. Epub 2008 Jun 19. Age Ageing. 2008. PMID: 18565980
-
Development of the Falls Risk for Older People in the Community (FROP-Com) screening tool.Age Ageing. 2009 Jan;38(1):40-6. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afn196. Age Ageing. 2009. PMID: 19141507
-
Assessing the fall risks of community-dwelling stroke survivors using the Short-form Physiological Profile Assessment (S-PPA).PLoS One. 2019 May 21;14(5):e0216769. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216769. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 31112580 Free PMC article.
-
Falls efficacy instruments for community-dwelling older adults: a COSMIN-based systematic review.BMC Geriatr. 2021 Jan 7;21(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01960-7. BMC Geriatr. 2021. PMID: 33413136 Free PMC article.
-
A systematic review of the psychometric properties of physical performance tests for sarcopenia in community-dwelling older adults.Age Ageing. 2024 Jun 1;53(6):afae113. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afae113. Age Ageing. 2024. PMID: 38851214 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Reliability and validity of the fall risk self-assessment scale for community-dwelling older people in China: a pilot study.BMC Geriatr. 2022 Apr 1;22(1):272. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-02962-3. BMC Geriatr. 2022. PMID: 35365082 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous