Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 21;117(4):1078-1090.
doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvaa141.

Ventricular fibrillation mechanism and global fibrillatory organization are determined by gap junction coupling and fibrosis pattern

Affiliations

Ventricular fibrillation mechanism and global fibrillatory organization are determined by gap junction coupling and fibrosis pattern

Balvinder S Handa et al. Cardiovasc Res. .

Abstract

Aims: Conflicting data exist supporting differing mechanisms for sustaining ventricular fibrillation (VF), ranging from disorganized multiple-wavelet activation to organized rotational activities (RAs). Abnormal gap junction (GJ) coupling and fibrosis are important in initiation and maintenance of VF. We investigated whether differing ventricular fibrosis patterns and the degree of GJ coupling affected the underlying VF mechanism.

Methods and results: Optical mapping of 65 Langendorff-perfused rat hearts was performed to study VF mechanisms in control hearts with acute GJ modulation, and separately in three differing chronic ventricular fibrosis models; compact fibrosis (CF), diffuse fibrosis (DiF), and patchy fibrosis (PF). VF dynamics were quantified with phase mapping and frequency dominance index (FDI) analysis, a power ratio of the highest amplitude dominant frequency in the cardiac frequency spectrum. Enhanced GJ coupling with rotigaptide (n = 10) progressively organized fibrillation in a concentration-dependent manner; increasing FDI (0 nM: 0.53 ± 0.04, 80 nM: 0.78 ± 0.03, P < 0.001), increasing RA-sustained VF time (0 nM: 44 ± 6%, 80 nM: 94 ± 2%, P < 0.001), and stabilized RAs (maximum rotations for an RA; 0 nM: 5.4 ± 0.5, 80 nM: 48.2 ± 12.3, P < 0.001). GJ uncoupling with carbenoxolone progressively disorganized VF; the FDI decreased (0 µM: 0.60 ± 0.05, 50 µM: 0.17 ± 0.03, P < 0.001) and RA-sustained VF time decreased (0 µM: 61 ± 9%, 50 µM: 3 ± 2%, P < 0.001). In CF, VF activity was disorganized and the RA-sustained VF time was the lowest (CF: 27 ± 7% vs. PF: 75 ± 5%, P < 0.001). Global fibrillatory organization measured by FDI was highest in PF (PF: 0.67 ± 0.05 vs. CF: 0.33 ± 0.03, P < 0.001). PF harboured the longest duration and most spatially stable RAs (patchy: 1411 ± 266 ms vs. compact: 354 ± 38 ms, P < 0.001). DiF (n = 11) exhibited an intermediately organized VF pattern, sustained by a combination of multiple-wavelets and short-lived RAs.

Conclusion: The degree of GJ coupling and pattern of fibrosis influences the mechanism sustaining VF. There is a continuous spectrum of organization in VF, ranging between globally organized fibrillation sustained by stable RAs and disorganized, possibly multiple-wavelet driven fibrillation with no RAs.

Keywords: Fibrillation; Fibrosis; Gap junctions; Mechanisms; Rotational activity; Ventricular fibrillation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1
Figure 1
Enhanced GJ coupling regularizes VF to VT. Representative ECGs in response to (A) RTG (0–80 nM) with progressive regularization of VF to VT and (B) CBX (0–50 µM) with progressive VF disorganization on ECG. (C) Representative phase maps with tracked RAs in VF in response to RTG 80 nM showing existence of spatially stable RAs. (D) Representative phase maps in VF in response to CBX 50 µM showing disorganized myocardial activation only.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The degree of GJ coupling influences the stability of RAs. Representative RA heat map in (A) RTG- and (B) CBX-treated hearts in VF. (C) Progressive increase in maximum rotations for a single RA in RTG group in comparison to decrease with CBX. (D) Increase in percentage of VF time driven by RAs at increasing RTG concentrations comparative to decrease with CBX. Data from RTG (n = 10) and CBX (n = 10) hearts. Statistical analysis with repeated measures ANOVA, post hoc Bonferroni, P-values are in comparison to baseline, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Enhanced GJ coupling increases the global fibrillatory organization. Representative DF maps in response to (A) RTG and (B) CBX in VF. The DF of the largest organized region or the m-DF is indicated below in hertz (Hz). (C) A graph showing an increase in the FDI in RTG-treated hearts in comparison to (D) decrease with CBX. Data from RTG (n = 10) and CBX (n = 10) hearts. Statistical analysis with repeated measures ANOVA, post hoc Bonferroni, P-values are in comparison to baseline, ***P < 0.001. m-DF, maximal DF.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Validation of differing ventricular fibrosis models. (A) Representative ECG traces in differing fibrosis models in VF. (B) Representative mid-LV axial histological sections of fibrotic areas (dark red) and normal tissue (orange to pink), scale—black bar corresponds to 1 mm. (C) Histological LV fibrosis quantification. (D) Representative mid-LV short-axis slices with LGE. Data in (C) from select hearts; sham (n = 4), CF (n = 7), DiF (n = 7), and PF (n = 7) hearts. Statistical analysis with ANOVA post hoc Bonferroni multiple comparisons test, ***P < 0.001.
Figure 5
Figure 5
The pattern of fibrosis influences the stability of RAs in fibrillation. (A) Representative RA heat maps for differing fibrosis models; CF, DiF, and PF hearts in VF. (B) Percentage of VF time driven by RAs and (C) maximum duration for a single RA in the PF group is higher in comparison to sham surgery, CF and DiF groups. Data from sham surgery (n = 5), CF (n = 11), DiF (n = 11), and PF (n = 13) hearts. Statistical analysis with ANOVA, post hoc Bonferroni multiple comparisons test, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
Figure 6
Figure 6
PF anchors RAs and sustains the most globally organized fibrillation. (A) Representative DF maps in differing fibrosis groups; CF, DiF, and PF hearts in VF. The DF of the largest organized region or the m-DF is indicated below in hertz (Hz). (B) A graph showing the highest FDI in the PF group in comparison to DiF and CF. (C) Two representative PF hearts showing the mapped surface with fibrosis border in view (left), phase processed RA heat maps (middle), and corresponding histological cross-section from the shaded region (pink, pale yellow = normal myocardium, dark red = fibrosis, scale—black bar = 1 mm). Data from sham surgery (n = 5), CF (n = 11), DiF (n = 11), and PF (n = 13) hearts. Statistical analysis with ANOVA, post hoc Bonferroni multiple comparisons test, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. m-DF, maximal DF.
Figure 7
Figure 7
The meander of RAs is lowest in PF and reduces with enhanced GJ coupling. Representative tracked paths of the longest duration RA (threshold—>5 rotations) in (A) RTG-treated group and (B) differing fibrosis groups; CF, DiF, and PF (left) and the corresponding centre shift from initiation to termination site over time (right). Data from RTG (n = 10) treated hearts in (A) and sham surgery (n = 5), CF (n = 11), DiF (n = 11), and PF (n = 13) hearts in (B). Statistical analysis with repeated measures ANOVA, post hoc Bonferroni, P-values are in comparison to baseline in (A) and ANOVA, post hoc Bonferroni multiple comparisons test in (B). *P < 0.05 and ***P < 0.001.

Comment in

References

    1. Nash MP, Mourad A, Clayton RH, Sutton PM, Bradley CP, Hayward M, Paterson DJ, Taggart P.. Evidence for multiple mechanisms in human ventricular fibrillation. Circulation 2006;114:536–542. - PubMed
    1. Nair K, Umapathy K, Farid T, Masse S, Mueller E, Sivanandan RV, Poku K, Rao V, Nair V, Butany J, Ideker RE, Nanthakumar K.. Intramural activation during early human ventricular fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2011;4:692–703. - PubMed
    1. Haïssaguerre M, Hocini M, Cheniti G, Duchateau J, Sacher F, Puyo S, Cochet H, Takigawa M, Denis A, Martin R, Derval N, Bordachar P, Ritter P, Ploux S, Pambrun T, Klotz N, Massoullié G, Pillois X, Dallet C, Schott JJ, Scouarnec S, Ackerman MJ, Tester D, Piot O, Pasquié JL, Leclerc C, Hermida JS, Gandjbakhch E, Maury P, Labrousse L, Coronel R, Jais P, Benoist D, Vigmond E, Potse M, Walton R, Nademanee K, Bernus O, Dubois R.. Localized structural alterations underlying a subset of unexplained sudden cardiac death. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2018;11:e006120. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zaitsev AV, Berenfeld O, Mironov SF, Jalife J, Pertsov AM.. Distribution of excitation frequencies on the epicardial and endocardial surfaces of fibrillating ventricular wall of the sheep heart. Circ Res 2000;86:408–417. - PubMed
    1. Disertori M, Rigoni M, Pace N, Casolo G, Masè M, Gonzini L, Lucci D, Nollo G, Ravelli F.. Myocardial fibrosis assessment by LGE is a powerful predictor of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in ischemic and nonischemic LV dysfunction: a meta-analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2016;9:1046–1055. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources