Quality of English-language videos on YouTube as a source of information on systemic lupus erythematosus
- PMID: 32406201
- DOI: 10.1111/1756-185X.13852
Quality of English-language videos on YouTube as a source of information on systemic lupus erythematosus
Abstract
Background: Many patients turn to online platforms to obtain healthcare information, but the quality and accuracy of the information is largely unknown. The objective of this study was to evaluate the reliability and quality of the most viewed English-language YouTube videos on systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).
Methods: YouTube was searched using keywords "systemic lupus erythematosus" and videos were categorized as useful information, misleading information, useful patient opinion, and misleading patient opinion. Reliability was scored using a modified 5-point DISCERN tool (where higher scores represent greater reliability), while quality was rated using the 5-point Global Quality Scale (GQS). Content covered included epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical features, diagnosis and treatment of SLE.
Results: Of the top 183 relevant videos, 124 (67.8%) were classified as useful information, 21 (11.5%) as misleading information, 29 (15.8%) as useful patient opinion, 9 (4.9%) as misleading patient opinion. Useful information videos were primarily produced by professionals (62.1%), with videos being of greater reliability and quality than other groups. However, video characteristics collected were largely comparable across all groups. The majority (68.9%) of the videos addressed patients.
Conclusion: Our findings highlight an abundance of YouTube videos with useful information on SLE, that are mostly reliable and of high quality. However, in order to effectively educate patients, pitfalls such as misleading content, falsely elevated video characteristics and non-professional sources need to be made known to patients. As part of holistic care, healthcare professionals should advise patients to seek information from reputed sources.
Keywords: YouTube; education; misleading; patient education; systemic lupus erythematosus.
© 2020 Asia Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Gergianaki I, Bortoluzzi A, Bertsias G. Update on the epidemiology, risk factors, and disease outcomes of systemic lupus erythematosus. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2018;32(2):188-205.
-
- Zhang L, Luan W, Geng S, et al. Lack of patient education is risk factor of disease flare in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus in China. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):378.
-
- Wu GC, Cao F, Shen HH, Hu LQ, Hu Y, Sam NB. Global public interest in systemic lupus erythematosus: an investigation based on internet search data. Lupus. 2019;28(12):1435-1440.
-
- Pons-Estel GJ, Ugarte-Gil MF, Alarcon GS. Epidemiology of systemic lupus erythematosus. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2017;13(8):799-814.
-
- Chakravarty EF, Bush TM, Manzi S, Clarke AE, Ward MM. Prevalence of adult systemic lupus erythematosus in California and Pennsylvania in 2000: estimates obtained using hospitalization data. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;56(6):2092-2094.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
