Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 May 14;63(1):e39.
doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2020.37.

Experiences with legally mandated treatment in patients with schizophrenia: A systematic review of qualitative studies

Joanne E Plahouras  1   2 , Shobha Mehta  1   2 , Daniel Z Buchman  3   4   5   6 , George Foussias  1   7   8   9 , Zafiris J Daskalakis  1   2   7   8 , Daniel M Blumberger  1   2   7   8
Affiliations

Experiences with legally mandated treatment in patients with schizophrenia: A systematic review of qualitative studies

Joanne E Plahouras et al. Eur Psychiatry. .

Abstract

Background: Patients with severe mental illness, including schizophrenia, may be legally mandated to undergo psychiatric treatment. Patients' experiences in these situations are not well characterized. This systematic review of qualitative studies aims to describe the experiences of patients with schizophrenia and related disorders who have undergone legally mandated treatment.

Methods: Four bibliographic databases were searched: CINAHL Plus (1981-2019), EMBASE (1947-2019), MEDLINE (1946-2019), and PsycINFO (1806-2019). These databases were searched for keywords, text words, and medical subject headings related to schizophrenia, legally mandated treatment and patient experience. The reference lists of included studies and systematic reviews were also investigated. The identified titles and abstracts were reviewed for study inclusion. A thematic analysis was completed for the synthesis of positive and negative aspects of legally mandated treatment.

Results: A total of 4,008 citations were identified. Eighteen studies were included in the final synthesis. For the thematic analysis, results were collated under two broad themes; positive patient experiences and negative patient experiences. Patients were satisfied when their autonomy was respected, and dissatisfied when it was not. Patients often retrospectively recognized that their treatment was beneficial. Furthermore, negative aspects of the treatment included deficits in communication and a lack of information.

Conclusions: Intervention research has historically focused on clinical outcomes and the quantitative aspects of treatment. Thus, this study provides insight into the qualitative aspects of patients' experiences with legally mandated treatment. Recognizing these opinions and experiences can lead to better attitudes toward treatment for patients with schizophrenia and related psychiatric illnesses.

Keywords: involuntary treatment; qualitative; review; schizophrenia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Study flow diagram.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. McGrath J, Saha S, Chant D, Welham J. Schizophrenia: a concise overview of incidence, prevalence, and mortality. Epidemiol Rev. 2008;30(1):67–76. - PubMed
    1. Owen MJ, Sawa A, Mortensen PB. Schizophrenia. Lancet. 2016;388(10039):86–97.doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(15)01121-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Association AP. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®). American Psychiatric Pub; Arlington, United States: 2013.
    1. Jääskeläinen E, Juola P, Hirvonen N, McGrath JJ, Saha S, Isohanni M, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of recovery in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2012;39(6):1296–1306. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chong HY, Teoh SL, Wu DB-C, Kotirum S, Chiou C-F, Chaiyakunapruk N. Global economic burden of schizophrenia: a systematic review. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2016;12:357. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types