Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul;22(7):885-900.
doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2020.03.009. Epub 2020 May 12.

Application of Multiplex Bisulfite PCR-Ligase Detection Reaction-Real-Time Quantitative PCR Assay in Interrogating Bioinformatically Identified, Blood-Based Methylation Markers for Colorectal Cancer

Affiliations

Application of Multiplex Bisulfite PCR-Ligase Detection Reaction-Real-Time Quantitative PCR Assay in Interrogating Bioinformatically Identified, Blood-Based Methylation Markers for Colorectal Cancer

Manny D Bacolod et al. J Mol Diagn. 2020 Jul.

Abstract

The analysis of CpG methylation in circulating tumor DNA fragments has emerged as a promising approach for the noninvasive early detection of solid tumors, including colorectal cancer (CRC). The most commonly employed assay involves bisulfite conversion of circulating tumor DNA, followed by targeted PCR, then real-time quantitative PCR (alias methylation-specific PCR). This report demonstrates the ability of a multiplex bisulfite PCR-ligase detection reaction-real-time quantitative PCR assay to detect seven methylated CpG markers (CRC or colon specific), in both simulated (approximately 30 copies of fragmented CRC cell line DNA mixed with approximately 3000 copies of fragmented peripheral blood DNA) and CRC patient-derived cell-free DNAs. This scalable assay is designed for multiplexing and incorporates steps for improved sensitivity and specificity, including the enrichment of methylated CpG fragments, ligase detection reaction, the incorporation of ribose bases in primers, and use of uracil DNA glycosylase. Six of the seven CpG markers (located in promoter regions of PPP1R16B, KCNA3, CLIP4, GDF6, SEPT9, and GSG1L) were identified through integrated analyses of genome-wide methylation data sets for 31 different types of cancer. These markers were mapped to CpG sites at the promoter region of VIM; VIM and SEPT9 are established epigenetic markers of CRC. Additional bioinformatics analyses show that the methylation at these CpG sites negatively correlates with the transcription of their corresponding genes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The scheme for identification and selection of CpG methylation markers tested for bisulfite PCR–ligase detection reaction–real-time quantitative PCR assay development. CRC, colorectal cancer; GEO, Gene Expression Omnibus; TCGA, The Cancer Genome Atlas.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparative methylation of the seven CpG markers (which the multiplex assay was designed for) in normal colon tissues [solid normal (SN)] and each of the three microsatellite (MS) subtype colorectal cancer primary tumors: high MS instability (MSI-H), low MSI (MSI-L), and MS stable (MSS).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Schematic of bisulfite PCR–ligase detection reaction–real-time quantitative PCR assay for detection of CpG methylation. 1. Bisulfite conversion. 2. Linear amplification (reverse primer only). 3. Digestion by uracil-N-DNA glycosylase (UDG). 4. PCR (add forward primer). 5. Ligase detection reaction. 6. Digestion by UDG. 7. ViiA7 real-time PCR.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Single-molecule detection of methylation of m_VIM by pixel PCR–ligase detection reaction–real-time quantitative PCR. AC: Detection of 12 (A), 6 (B), and 0 (C) methylated molecules in presence of 2500 nonmethylated molecules. D: No template control. Rn, normalized reporter value.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Multiplexed detection of seven colorectal cancer (CRC) methylation markers by bisulfite PCR–ligase detection reaction–real-time quantitative PCR in simulated plasma sample (ie, average of 30 molecules of each methylated CpG marker mixed in 3000 unmethylated CpG markers from normal DNA; A), as well as plasma samples from CRC patients (B, D, and F) and healthy individuals (C, E, and G). cfDNA, cell-free DNA; Rn, normalized reporter value.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bray F., Ferlay J., Soerjomataram I., Siegel R.L., Torre L.A., Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424. - PubMed
    1. Siegel R.L., Miller K.D., Fedewa S.A., Ahnen D.J., Meester R.G.S., Barzi A., Jemal A. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67:177–193. - PubMed
    1. Rex D.K., Boland C.R., Dominitz J.A., Giardiello F.M., Johnson D.A., Kaltenbach T., Levin T.R., Lieberman D., Robertson D.J. Colorectal cancer screening: recommendations for physicians and patients from the U.S. Multi-Society task force on colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology. 2017;153:307–323. - PubMed
    1. Beydoun H.A., Beydoun M.A. Predictors of colorectal cancer screening behaviors among average-risk older adults in the United States. Cancer Causes Control. 2008;19:339–359. - PubMed
    1. Das V., Kalita J., Pal M. Predictive and prognostic biomarkers in colorectal cancer: a systematic review of recent advances and challenges. Biomed Pharmacother. 2016;87:8–19. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms