Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep;102(3):180-185.
doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.05.002. Epub 2020 May 12.

An exploratory analysis on the influence of genetic variants on weight gain among etonogestrel contraceptive implant users

Affiliations

An exploratory analysis on the influence of genetic variants on weight gain among etonogestrel contraceptive implant users

Aaron Lazorwitz et al. Contraception. 2020 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: To identify genetic variants associated with weight gain related to etonogestrel contraceptive implant use.

Study design: We conducted a retrospective analysis from a parent pharmacogenomic study of healthy, reproductive-aged women using etonogestrel implants. We reviewed medical records to calculate objective weight changes from implant insertion to study enrollment and asked participants about subjective weight gain (yes/no) during contraceptive implant use. We used genotyping data (99 genetic variants) from the parent study to conduct backward-stepwise generalized linear modeling to identify genetic variants associated with objective weight changes.

Results: Among 276 ethnically diverse participants, median body-mass index (BMI) was 25.8 kg/m2 (range 18.5-48.1). We found a median weight change of +3.2 kg (range -27.6 to +26.5) from implant insertion to study enrollment. Report of subjective weight gain had minimal agreement with measured weight gain during implant use (Cohen's kappa = 0.21). Our final generalized linear model contained two variables associated with objective weight change that met conservative statistical significance (p < 5.0 × 10-4). Participants with two copies (homozygous) of the ESR1 rs9340799 variant on average gained 14.1 kg more than all other participants (p = 1.4 × 10-4). Higher enrollment BMI was also associated with objective weight gain (β = 0.54, p = 9.4 × 10-12).

Conclusion: Genetic variants in the estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) do not have known associations with obesity or metabolic syndrome, but there is physiologic plausibility for a progestin-mediated genetic association between ESR1 and weight gain. Additional genetic research is needed to substantiate our findings and elucidate further advances in individualized counseling on the risk of weight gain with exogenous steroid hormones.

Implications: Genetic variation in the estrogen receptor 1 gene may account for variability in weight gain among etonogestrel contraceptive implant users. If these findings can be replicated with other progestin-containing medications, we may be able to better individualize contraceptive counseling.

Keywords: Contraception; Estrogen receptor; Etonogestrel; Obesity; Pharmacogenomics; Weight gain.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Financial Disclosure: Dr. Teal serves on a Data Monitoring Board for a study funded by Merck and Co. and has served as a consultant for Bayer Healthcare. The University of Colorado Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology has received research funding from Bayer, Agile Therapeutics, Merck and Co, and Medicines360. The other authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1 Legend:
Figure 1 Legend:
Histogram of weight change from implant insertion to study enrollment for all 276 participants with available medical records.
Figure 2 Legend:
Figure 2 Legend:
Box plots of weight change from implant insertion to study enrollment among participants with the CYP2C19 rs7088784 wild-type genotype (n=248) compared with CYP2C19 rs7088784 variant carriers (n=48), excluding those with unknown genotype for this single nucleotide polymorphism (n=54). The box represents the first and third quartiles with the band inside the box representing the median for each respective group. The whiskers represent the data within 1.5 interquartile range of the upper and lower quartile. Circles indicate outliers with values between 1.5 times and 3 times the IQR and asterisks indicate outliers with values greater than 3 times the IQR.
Figure 3 Legend:
Figure 3 Legend:
Box plots of weight change from implant insertion to study enrollment among participants homozygous for the ESR1 rs9340799 variant allele (n=7) versus carriers of at least one wild-type allele (n=324), excluding those with unknown genotype for this single nucleotide polymorphism (n=19). The box represents the first and third quartiles with the band inside the box representing the median for each respective group. The whiskers represent the data within 1.5 interquartile range of the upper and lower quartile. Circles indicate outliers with values between 1.5 times and 3 times the IQR and asterisks indicate outliers with values greater than 3 times the IQR.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Croxatto HB, Urbancsek J, Massai R, Bennink HC, van Beek A. A multicentre efficacy and safety study of the single contraceptive implant Implanon®. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:976–81. - PubMed
    1. Lopez LM, Ramesh S, Chen M, Edelman A, Ottemess C, Trussed J, et al. Progestin-only contraceptives: effects on weight. Cochrane Database SystRev. 2016;(8):CD008815. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bahamondes L, Brache V, Ali M, Habib N. A multicenter randomized clinical trial of etonogestrel and levonorgestrel contraceptive implants with nonrandomized copper intrauterine device controls: effect on weight variations up to 3 years after placement. Contraception. 2018;98:181–7. - PubMed
    1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Drug Development and Drug Interactions: Table of Substrates, Inhibitors, and Inducers, https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-interactions-labeling/drug-development-an...; 2020. [accessed 15 March 2020]
    1. Modesto W, Dal Ava N, Monteiro I, Bahamondes L. Body composition and bone mineral density in users of the etonogestrel-releasing contraceptive implant. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015;292:1387–91. - PubMed

Publication types