Effects of Tenofovir vs Entecavir on Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients With Chronic HBV Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
- PMID: 32407970
- DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.05.008
Effects of Tenofovir vs Entecavir on Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients With Chronic HBV Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Abstract
Background & aims: Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and entecavir are recommended as first-line treatments for chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. However, there is debate over the comparative effectiveness of these drugs in preventing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of TDF vs entecavir in reducing the incidence of HCC among patients with chronic HBV infection.
Methods: We performed a systematic review of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library from 2010 through 2019 for full-text articles and conference abstracts on studies of effects of TDF vs entecavir in patients with HBV infection. Extracted data were analyzed with the random-effects model. Potential sources of heterogeneity were investigated using sensitivity, meta-regression, and subgroup analyses.
Results: Our final analysis comprised 15 studies (61,787 patients; 16,101 patients given TDF and 45,686 given entecavir). TDF treatment was associated with a significantly lower risk of HCC than entecavir (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.69-0.93; P = .003; I2 = 13%). The lower risk of HCC in patients given TDF compared with entecavir persisted in sensitivity and subcohort analyses performed with propensity score-matched cohorts and cirrhosis subcohorts. Inclusion of patients with decompensated cirrhosis and the sample size were the factors with the largest effects on between-study heterogeneity in meta-regression analyses. Subsequent subgroup analyses showed no statistical differences in the incidence of death or transplantation (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.73-1.17; P = .519; I2 = 6%) between patients given TDF vs entecavir.
Conclusions: In a meta-analysis of studies of patients with chronic HBV infection, we found that TDF treatment was associated with a significantly lower (20%) risk of HCC than entecavir treatment. Randomized trials are needed to support this finding.
Keywords: CHB; Comparison; Liver Cancer; Therapy.
Copyright © 2021 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Effects of Tenofovir vs Entecavir on Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients With CHB: A Comment for Moving Forward.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Feb;20(2):e342. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.03.014. Epub 2021 Mar 11. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022. PMID: 33716140 No abstract available.
-
Reply.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Feb;20(2):e342-e343. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.03.035. Epub 2021 Mar 31. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022. PMID: 33798710 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in antiviral treatment-naïve chronic hepatitis B patients treated with entecavir or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate: a network meta-analysis.BMC Cancer. 2022 Mar 17;22(1):287. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09413-7. BMC Cancer. 2022. PMID: 35300634 Free PMC article.
-
Tenofovir Is Associated With Lower Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Than Entecavir in Patients With Chronic HBV Infection in China.Gastroenterology. 2020 Jan;158(1):215-225.e6. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.09.025. Epub 2019 Sep 28. Gastroenterology. 2020. PMID: 31574268
-
A multicenter study of entecavir vs. tenofovir on prognosis of treatment-naïve chronic hepatitis B in South Korea.J Hepatol. 2019 Sep;71(3):456-464. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.03.028. Epub 2019 Apr 6. J Hepatol. 2019. PMID: 30959156
-
Magnitude of and prediction for risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic hepatitis B taking entecavir or tenofovir therapy: A systematic review.J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Oct;35(10):1684-1693. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15078. Epub 2020 May 17. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020. PMID: 32343431
-
Lower risk of hepatocellular carcinoma with tenofovir than entecavir treatment in subsets of chronic hepatitis B patients: an updated meta-analysis.J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 May;37(5):782-794. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15783. Epub 2022 Feb 7. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022. PMID: 35080052 Review.
Cited by
-
Secondary prevention for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic hepatitis B: are all the nucleos(t)ide analogues the same?J Gastroenterol. 2020 Nov;55(11):1023-1036. doi: 10.1007/s00535-020-01726-3. Epub 2020 Sep 24. J Gastroenterol. 2020. PMID: 32974760 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Secondary prevention of hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma with current antiviral therapies.Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2021 Apr;37(4):262-267. doi: 10.1002/kjm2.12364. Epub 2021 Jan 27. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2021. PMID: 33502828 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Tenofovir alafenamide and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate reduce incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic hepatitis B.JHEP Rep. 2023 Jul 13;5(10):100847. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2023.100847. eCollection 2023 Oct. JHEP Rep. 2023. PMID: 37771546 Free PMC article.
-
Recent Advances in Hepatitis B Treatment.Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2021 May 1;14(5):417. doi: 10.3390/ph14050417. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34062711 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparative effectiveness of tenofovir versus entecavir in patients with hepatitis B virus-related cirrhosis in Taiwan: a retrospective cohort study.Front Pharmacol. 2023 Dec 19;14:1301120. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1301120. eCollection 2023. Front Pharmacol. 2023. PMID: 38174221 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical