Agrochemicals with estrogenic endocrine disrupting properties: Lessons Learned?
- PMID: 32407980
- PMCID: PMC9448509
- DOI: 10.1016/j.mce.2020.110860
Agrochemicals with estrogenic endocrine disrupting properties: Lessons Learned?
Abstract
Many agrochemicals have endocrine disrupting properties. A subset of these chemicals is characterized as "estrogenic". In this review, we describe several distinct ways that chemicals used in crop production can affect estrogen signaling. Using three agrochemicals as examples (DDT, endosulfan, and atrazine), we illustrate how screening tests such as the US EPA's EDSP Tier 1 assays can be used as a first-pass approach to evaluate agrochemicals for endocrine activity. We then apply the "Key Characteristics" approach to illustrate how chemicals like DDT can be evaluated, together with the World Health Organization's definition of an endocrine disruptor, to identify data gaps. We conclude by describing important issues that must be addressed in the evaluation and regulation of hormonally active agrochemicals including mixture effects, efforts to reduce vertebrate animal use, chemical prioritization, and improvements in hazard, exposure, and risk assessments.
Keywords: Adverse effect; Aromatase; Estrogen receptor; Mode of action; Pesticide; Xenoestrogen.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
Assessment of chemical effects on aromatase activity using the H295R cell line.Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2010 Jun;17(5):1137-48. doi: 10.1007/s11356-009-0285-3. Epub 2010 Jan 20. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2010. PMID: 20087668
-
Introduction to "screening for endocrine activity-experiences with the US EPA's endocrine disruptor screening program and future considerations".Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol. 2014 Feb;101(1):1-2. doi: 10.1002/bdrb.21100. Epub 2014 Feb 7. Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol. 2014. PMID: 24510782 No abstract available.
-
Evaluation of EPA's Tier 1 Endocrine Screening Battery and recommendations for improving the interpretation of screening results.Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2011 Apr;59(3):397-411. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2011.01.003. Epub 2011 Jan 18. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2011. PMID: 21251942 Review.
-
Endocrine profiling and prioritization of environmental chemicals using ToxCast data.Environ Health Perspect. 2010 Dec;118(12):1714-20. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1002180. Epub 2010 Sep 8. Environ Health Perspect. 2010. PMID: 20826373 Free PMC article.
-
Application of Adverse Outcome Pathways to U.S. EPA's Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program.Environ Health Perspect. 2017 Sep 1;125(9):096001. doi: 10.1289/EHP1304. Environ Health Perspect. 2017. PMID: 28934726 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Perinatal Exposure to Glyphosate or a Commercial Formulation Alters Uterine Mechanistic Pathways Associated with Implantation Failure in Rats.Toxics. 2024 Aug 14;12(8):590. doi: 10.3390/toxics12080590. Toxics. 2024. PMID: 39195693 Free PMC article.
-
The role of endocrine disruptors in female infertility.Mol Biol Rep. 2023 Aug;50(8):7069-7088. doi: 10.1007/s11033-023-08583-2. Epub 2023 Jul 4. Mol Biol Rep. 2023. PMID: 37402067 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Health, Pesticide Adjuvants, and Inert Ingredients: California Case Study Illustrates Need for Data Access.Environ Health Perspect. 2022 Aug;130(8):85001. doi: 10.1289/EHP10634. Epub 2022 Aug 3. Environ Health Perspect. 2022. PMID: 35920661 Free PMC article.
-
Best practices to quantify the impact of reproductive toxicants on development, function, and diseases of the rodent mammary gland.Reprod Toxicol. 2022 Sep;112:51-67. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2022.06.011. Epub 2022 Jun 25. Reprod Toxicol. 2022. PMID: 35764275 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clinical and Demographic Features of Paracoccidioidomycosis in Argentina: A Multicenter Study Analysis of 466 Cases.J Fungi (Basel). 2023 Apr 17;9(4):482. doi: 10.3390/jof9040482. J Fungi (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37108936 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Popp J, Pető K, Nagy J. Pesticide productivity and food security. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 2013; 33:243–255
-
- Bennett B, Cooper J, Dobson H. We know where the shoe pinches: a case study-based analysis of the social benefits of pesticides. Outlook on Agriculture 2010; 39:79–87
-
- Gianessi L.The value of insecticides in US crop production. Croplife Foundation. Crop Protection Research Institute (CPRI) 2009;
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous