3D-bioprinted functional and biomimetic hydrogel scaffolds incorporated with nanosilicates to promote bone healing in rat calvarial defect model
- PMID: 32409059
- DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2020.110905
3D-bioprinted functional and biomimetic hydrogel scaffolds incorporated with nanosilicates to promote bone healing in rat calvarial defect model
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting is an extremely convenient biofabrication technique for creating biomimetic tissue-engineered bone constructs and has promising applications in regenerative medicine. However, existing bioinks have shown low mechanical strength, poor osteoinductive ability, and lacking a suitable microenvironment for laden cells. Nanosilicate (nSi) has shown to be a promising biomaterial, due to its unique properties such as excellent biocompatibility, degrade into nontoxic products, and with osteoinductive properties, which has been used in bone bioprinting. However, the long term bone healing effects and associating risks, if any, of using nSi in tissue engineering bone scaffolds in vivo are unclear and require a more thorough assessment prior to practical use. Hence, a functional and biomimetic nanocomposite bioink composed of rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (rBMSCs), nSi, gelatin and alginate for the 3D bioprinting of tissue-engineered bone constructs is firstly demonstrated, mimicking the structure of extracellular matrix, to create a conducive microenvironment for encapsulated cells. It is shown that the addition of nSi significantly increases the printability and mechanical strength of fabricated human-scale tissue or organ structures (up to 15 mm height) and induces osteogenic differentiation of the encapsulated rBMSCs in the absence of in vitro osteoinductive factors. A systematic in vivo research of the biomimetic nanocomposite bioink scaffolds is further demonstrated in a rat critical-size (8 mm) bone defect-repair model. The in vivo results demonstrate that the 3D bioprinted nanocomposite scaffolds can significantly promote the bone healing of the rat calvarial defects compared to other scaffolds without nSi or cells, and show rarely side effects on the recipients. Given the above advantageous properties, the 3D bioprinted nanocomposite scaffolds can greatly accelerate the bone healing in critical bone defects, thus providing a clinical potential candidate for orthopedic applications.
Keywords: 3D bioprinting; Angiogenesis; Bone healing; Nanocomposite bioink; Osteogenesis.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Similar articles
-
Composite bioink incorporating cell-laden liver decellularized extracellular matrix for bioprinting of scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.Biomater Adv. 2024 Dec;165:214017. doi: 10.1016/j.bioadv.2024.214017. Epub 2024 Aug 30. Biomater Adv. 2024. PMID: 39236580
-
Hybrid biofabrication of 3D osteoconductive constructs comprising Mg-based nanocomposites and cell-laden bioinks for bone repair.Bone. 2022 Jan;154:116198. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2021.116198. Epub 2021 Sep 15. Bone. 2022. PMID: 34534709
-
3D bioprinting of graphene oxide-incorporated cell-laden bone mimicking scaffolds for promoting scaffold fidelity, osteogenic differentiation and mineralization.Acta Biomater. 2021 Feb;121:637-652. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.12.026. Epub 2020 Dec 14. Acta Biomater. 2021. PMID: 33326888
-
Nanocomposite bioinks for 3D bioprinting.Acta Biomater. 2022 Oct 1;151:45-69. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.08.014. Epub 2022 Aug 13. Acta Biomater. 2022. PMID: 35970479 Review.
-
Bioprinting: Mechanical Stabilization and Reinforcement Strategies in Regenerative Medicine.Tissue Eng Part A. 2024 Jul;30(13-14):387-408. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2023.0239. Epub 2024 Feb 9. Tissue Eng Part A. 2024. PMID: 38205634 Review.
Cited by
-
A Futuristic Development in 3D Printing Technique Using Nanomaterials with a Step Toward 4D Printing.ACS Omega. 2024 Aug 26;9(36):37445-37458. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.4c04123. eCollection 2024 Sep 10. ACS Omega. 2024. PMID: 39281933 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Up-to-date progress in bioprinting of bone tissue.Int J Bioprint. 2022 Oct 28;9(1):628. doi: 10.18063/ijb.v9i1.628. eCollection 2023. Int J Bioprint. 2022. PMID: 36636136 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Nanofiber-induced hierarchically-porous magnesium phosphate bone cements accelerate bone regeneration by inhibiting Notch signaling.Bioact Mater. 2024 Apr 25;37:459-476. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.03.021. eCollection 2024 Jul. Bioact Mater. 2024. PMID: 38698920 Free PMC article.
-
3D Printing and Bioprinting to Model Bone Cancer: The Role of Materials and Nanoscale Cues in Directing Cell Behavior.Cancers (Basel). 2021 Aug 12;13(16):4065. doi: 10.3390/cancers13164065. Cancers (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34439218 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Incorporation/Enrichment of 3D Bioprinted Constructs by Biomimetic Nanoparticles: Tuning Printability and Cell Behavior in Bone Models.Nanomaterials (Basel). 2023 Jul 10;13(14):2040. doi: 10.3390/nano13142040. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37513050 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources