Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2020 Jun;113(6):1242-1250.e4.
doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.01.015. Epub 2020 May 11.

Third grade academic achievement among children conceived with the use of in vitro fertilization: a population-based study in Texas

Barbara Luke  1 , Morton B Brown  2 , Mary K Ethen  3 , Mark A Canfield  3 , Stephanie Watkins  4 , Ethan Wantman  5 , Kevin J Doody  6
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Third grade academic achievement among children conceived with the use of in vitro fertilization: a population-based study in Texas

Barbara Luke et al. Fertil Steril. 2020 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate if there are differences in standardized testing results at the end of third grade between children conceived with the use of in vitro fertilization (IVF) and those conceived spontaneously.

Design: Retrospective population-based cohort.

Setting: Texas public school system.

Patient(s): Singleton and twin children 8-9 years of age who took the third-grade public school standardized testing in Texas from 2012 to 2018.

Intervention(s): None.

Main outcome measure(s): Standardized testing in reading and mathematics.

Result(s): After exclusions, there were 6,970 IVF and 12,690 non-IVF children with reading scores and 6,973 IVF and 12,729 non-IVF children with mathematics scores. IVF children scored significantly higher in reading (singletons: 1,543 ± 2 vs. 1,525 ± 1; twins: 1,534 ± 2 vs. 1,504 ± 5 [mean ± SE]), and mathematics (singletons: 1,566 ± 2 vs. 1,550 ± 1; twins: 1,557 ± 2 vs. 1,529 ± 5). Children of mothers ≥30 years of age scored consistently higher than children of mothers 18-29 years of age. The differences were of similar magnitude between IVF and control children for older ages, but not significant for IVF. Within the IVF group, there were no significant differences between children born from fresh versus froze-thawed embryos.

Conclusion(s): Children of ages 8-9 years who were conceived with the use of IVF performed as well on third-grade reading and math assessments as their counterparts who were conceived spontaneously. We also found consistent racial and ethnic differences, gender differences, and beneficial effects of older maternal age. Because we were not able to adjust adequately for socioeconomic status and other confounding factors, which may explain some of the observed differences, we conclude that there is no negative effect of IVF conception on academic achievement in third grade.

Keywords: IVF; academic achievement; end-of-grade testing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethan Wantman is employed by Redshift Technologies, the company which maintains the SART CORS database. All other authors report no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Study Population
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Luke B, Gopal D, Stern JE, Diop H. Pregnancy, birth, and infant outcomes by maternal fertility status: The Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2017; 217:327.e1–14. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.04.006. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Luke B, Gopal D, Stern JE, Diop H. Adverse pregnancy, birth, and infant outcomes in twins: Effects of maternal fertility status and infant gender combination. The Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2017; 217:330.e1–15. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.04.025. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pinborg A, Wennerholm UB, Romundstad LB, Loft A, Aittomaki K, Söderström-Anttila V, Nygren KG, Hazekamp J, Bergh C. Why do singletons conceived after assisted reproduction technology have adverse perinatal outcome? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2013; 19:87–104. - PubMed
    1. Romundstad LB, Romundstad PR, Sunde A, von Düring V, Skjærven R, Vatten LJ. Increased risk of placenta previa in pregnancies following IVF/ICSI: A comparison of ART and non-ART pregnancies in the same woman. Hum Reprod 2006; 21:2353–8. - PubMed
    1. Romundstad LB, Romundstad PR, Sunde A, von Düring V, Skjærven R, Gunnell D, Vatten LJ. Effects of technology or maternal factors on perinatal outcome after assisted fertilisation: A population-based cohort study. Lancet 2008; 372:737–743. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms