Implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a propensity score-matched analysis
- PMID: 32409887
- DOI: 10.1007/s00586-020-06445-0
Implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a propensity score-matched analysis
Abstract
Purpose: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS), still emerging for the spine, proposes a multimodal approach of perioperative care involving the optimization of every procedural step, with the patient in a proactive position regarding his/her management. We aimed to demonstrate a reduction in the length of hospital stay for ACDF without increasing the risk for patients by comparing 2 groups before and after ERAS implementation using propensity score (PS)-matched analysis.
Methods: We selected 2 periods of 1 year, before (n = 268 patients) and after ERAS implementation (n = 271 patients). Data were collected on patient demographics, operative and perioperative details, 90-day readmissions and morbidity. ERAS-trained nurses were involved to support patients at each pre/per/postoperative step with the help of a mobile app. A satisfaction survey was included. PS analyses were used for dealing with confounding bias in this retrospective observational study.
Results: After PS matching, the outcomes of 202 well-balanced pairs of patients were compared (conventional vs ERAS). LOS was reduced from 2.96 ± 1.35 to 1.40 ± 0.6 days (Student, p < 0.001). All 90-day surgical morbidity was similar between the 2 groups, including 30-day readmission (0.5% vs 0%; p = 1), 30- to 90-day readmission (0.5% vs 0.0%; p = 1), 90-day reoperation (0% vs 1%; p = 0.49), major complications (3.0% vs 3.5%; p = 1) and minor complications (2.0% vs 3.5%; p = 0.54). There was no significant difference concerning the satisfaction survey.
Conclusions: The introduction of ERAS for ACDF in our institution has resulted in a significant decrease in LOS, without causing an increase in postoperative complications and has maintained patients' satisfaction.
Keywords: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; Enhanced recovery after surgery; Fast track surgery; Propensity score.
Comment in
-
Letter to the Editor concerning "Implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a propensity score-matched analysis" authored by Debono B, et al. [Eur Spine J (2020): DOI 10.1007/s00586-020-06445-0].Eur Spine J. 2021 Apr;30(4):1081-1082. doi: 10.1007/s00586-021-06788-2. Epub 2021 Mar 1. Eur Spine J. 2021. PMID: 33649942 No abstract available.
-
Answer to the Letter to the Editor of Xu C, et al. concerning "Implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a propensity score-matched analysis" by Debono B et al. [Eur Spine J (2020): DOI 10.1007/s00586-020-06445-0].Eur Spine J. 2021 Apr;30(4):1083-1084. doi: 10.1007/s00586-021-06791-7. Epub 2021 Mar 15. Eur Spine J. 2021. PMID: 33721066 No abstract available.
References
-
- Kehlet H (1997) Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth 78:606–617. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/78.5.606 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Kehlet H, Wilmore DW (2008) Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery. Ann Surg 248:189–198. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31817f2c1a - DOI - PubMed
-
- Jones EL, Wainwright TW, Foster JD et al (2014) A systematic review of patient reported outcomes and patient experience in enhanced recovery after orthopaedic surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 96:89–94. https://doi.org/10.1308/003588414X13824511649571 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Ljungqvist O, Scott M, Fearon KC (2017) Enhanced recovery after surgery: a review. JAMA Surg 152:292–298. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4952 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Wainwright TW, Immins T, Middleton RG (2016) Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) and its applicability for major spine surgery. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 30:91–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpa.2015.11.001 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
