Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar;29(3):982-987.
doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06062-w. Epub 2020 May 14.

Successful mid- to long-term outcome after reconstruction of the extensor apparatus using proximal tibia-patellar tendon composite allograft

Affiliations

Successful mid- to long-term outcome after reconstruction of the extensor apparatus using proximal tibia-patellar tendon composite allograft

Pablo Puerta-GarciaSandoval et al. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Mar.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to assess the outcomes of extensor mechanism reconstruction with proximal tibia-patellar tendon composite allograft.

Methods: 24 consecutive patients treated with allograft-prosthetic composite for proximal tibia tumour resection and a conventional total knee arthroplasty were included. Extensor mechanism reconstruction was performed with a proximal tibia-patellar tendon composite allograft and the suture of the donor tendon to the remnant native patellar tendon. Function was evaluated by the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score (MSTS) and range of motion. Western Ontario and MacMaster University (WOMAC) and visual analogue scale for pain also were used.

Results: After a mean follow-up of 11.7 (range 3-15) years, mean MSTS score was 22.4 (range 20-30), mean flexion was 94.0° (range 84°-110°), and mean extension lag was 7.2° (range 0°-18°). The mean VAS-pain was 4.3 (range 2-6), and WOMAC score was 72.4 (range 58-100). There was no failure of the reconstructed extensor mechanism.

Conclusion: Patellar tendon reconstruction with allogeneic tissue from the proximal tibia allograft sutured to the recipient's remnant patellar tendon provides the mechanical support needed for healing of the reconstructed extensor mechanism with a substantial functional benefit to stabilize active knee extension and successful reconstruction survival at long-term.

Level of evidence: III.

Keywords: Allograft-prosthetic composite; Extensor mechanism; Patellar tendon; Proximal tibia tumour; Reconstruction.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Albergo JI, Gaston CL, Aponte-Tinao LA, Ayerza MA, Muscolo DL, Farfalli GL, Jeys LM, Carter SR, Tillman RM, Abudu AT, Grimer RJ (2017) Proximal tibia reconstruction after bone tumor resection: are survivorship and outcomes of endoprosthetic replacement and osteoarticular allograft similar? Clin Orthop Relat Res 475:676–682 - DOI
    1. Anract P, Missenard G, Jeanrot C, Dubois V, Tomeno B (2001) Knee reconstruction with prosthesis and muscle flap after total arthrectomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 384:208–216 - DOI
    1. Ayerza MA, Aponte-Tinao LA, Abalo E, Muscolo DL (2006) Continuity and function of patellar tendon host-donor suture in tibial allograft. Clin Orthop Relat Res 450:33–38 - DOI
    1. Barrack RL, Lyons T (2000) Proximal tibia-extensor mechanism composite allograft for revision TKA with chronic patellar tendon rupture. Acta Orthop Scand 71:419–421 - DOI
    1. Bellamy N, Buchanan W, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW (1988) Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip and the knee. J Rheumatol 15:1833–1840

LinkOut - more resources