Robotic surgery for gynecologic cancers: indications, techniques and controversies
- PMID: 32410262
- PMCID: PMC7387116
- DOI: 10.1111/jog.14228
Robotic surgery for gynecologic cancers: indications, techniques and controversies
Abstract
Minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic cancers is associated with fewer postoperative complications including less blood loss and quicker recovery time compared to traditional laparotomy. The robotic platform has allowed patients access to minimally invasive surgery due to its increased utilization by gynecologic oncologists. Many surgeons have embraced the robotic platform due to its technological advances over traditional laparoscopy including high-definition 3D optics, wristed instrumentation, camera stability and improved ergonomics. While robotic surgery continues as a mainstay in the management of gynecologic cancers, it remains controversial in regards to its cost effectiveness and more recently, its long-term impact on clinical and oncologic outcomes. A strong component of the justification of this surgical platform is based on extrapolated data from traditional laparoscopy despite limited prospective randomized trials for robotic-assisted surgery. In this review, we highlight the use of robotic surgery in the management of gynecologic cancers in special populations: fertility sparing patients, the morbidly obese, the elderly, and patients with a favorable response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Keywords: gynecologic cancer; minimally invasive surgery; robotic surgery; sentinel lymph node.
© 2020 Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Figures
References
-
- Da Vinci L. The Mechanics of Man. London: Royal Collection Trust, 2013.
