Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jun;46(6):828-843.
doi: 10.1111/jog.14228. Epub 2020 May 14.

Robotic surgery for gynecologic cancers: indications, techniques and controversies

Affiliations
Review

Robotic surgery for gynecologic cancers: indications, techniques and controversies

Kiran H Clair et al. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2020 Jun.

Abstract

Minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic cancers is associated with fewer postoperative complications including less blood loss and quicker recovery time compared to traditional laparotomy. The robotic platform has allowed patients access to minimally invasive surgery due to its increased utilization by gynecologic oncologists. Many surgeons have embraced the robotic platform due to its technological advances over traditional laparoscopy including high-definition 3D optics, wristed instrumentation, camera stability and improved ergonomics. While robotic surgery continues as a mainstay in the management of gynecologic cancers, it remains controversial in regards to its cost effectiveness and more recently, its long-term impact on clinical and oncologic outcomes. A strong component of the justification of this surgical platform is based on extrapolated data from traditional laparoscopy despite limited prospective randomized trials for robotic-assisted surgery. In this review, we highlight the use of robotic surgery in the management of gynecologic cancers in special populations: fertility sparing patients, the morbidly obese, the elderly, and patients with a favorable response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Keywords: gynecologic cancer; minimally invasive surgery; robotic surgery; sentinel lymph node.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Self-portrait of Leonardo da Vinci (1452–1519) and his detailed sketch of female anatomy.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Construction of Leonardo da Vinci’s mechanical drummer and mechanical knight, on display in Berlin. Designed around 1495 for a pageant in Milan, the Robotic Knight consisted of a life-size suite of armor filled with gears and wheels connected to an elaborate pulley and cable system allowing for independent motion (sitting down, standing up, moving its head, lifting its visor, and even playing the drums; rumors also suggested the Knight had the secret ability to write messages and draw pictures). This prototype was built by roboticist Mark Rosheim in 2002.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The DaVinci Xi Surgical Robot and DaVinci Robot Firefly™ technology demonstrating sentinel lymphatic mapping for endometrial cancer through which near-infrared light excites indocyanine green tracer to emit a fluorescent signal. Images from Dr. Tewari’s surgical practice.

References

    1. Moran ME. The da Vinci robot. J Endourol 2006; 20: 986–990. 10.1089/end.2006.20.986. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Da Vinci L. The Mechanics of Man. London: Royal Collection Trust, 2013.
    1. Mack MJ. Minimally invasive and robotic surgery. JAMA 2001; 285: 568–572. 10.1001/jama.285.5.568. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Reichenbach M, Frederick T, Cubrich L et al. Telesurgery with miniature robots to leverage surgical expertise in distributed expeditionary environments. Mil Med 2017; 182: 316–321. 10.7205/milmed-d-16-00176. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Marescaux J, Leroy J, Gagner M et al. Transatlantic robot-assisted telesurgery. Nature 2001; 413: 379–380. 10.1038/35096636. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms