Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Apr 28:14:400.
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00400. eCollection 2020.

Opportunities and Challenges for Using Automatic Human Affect Analysis in Consumer Research

Affiliations

Opportunities and Challenges for Using Automatic Human Affect Analysis in Consumer Research

Dennis Küster et al. Front Neurosci. .

Abstract

The ability to automatically assess emotional responses via contact-free video recording taps into a rapidly growing market aimed at predicting consumer choices. If consumer attention and engagement are measurable in a reliable and accessible manner, relevant marketing decisions could be informed by objective data. Although significant advances have been made in automatic affect recognition, several practical and theoretical issues remain largely unresolved. These concern the lack of cross-system validation, a historical emphasis of posed over spontaneous expressions, as well as more fundamental issues regarding the weak association between subjective experience and facial expressions. To address these limitations, the present paper argues that extant commercial and free facial expression classifiers should be rigorously validated in cross-system research. Furthermore, academics and practitioners must better leverage fine-grained emotional response dynamics, with stronger emphasis on understanding naturally occurring spontaneous expressions, and in naturalistic choice settings. We posit that applied consumer research might be better situated to examine facial behavior in socio-emotional contexts rather than decontextualized, laboratory studies, and highlight how AHAA can be successfully employed in this context. Also, facial activity should be considered less as a single outcome variable, and more as a starting point for further analyses. Implications of this approach and potential obstacles that need to be overcome are discussed within the context of consumer research.

Keywords: automatic human affect analysis (AHAA); consumer research; dynamic responses; facial expression; machine learning; spontaneous expressions.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ambadar Z., Schooler J. W., Cohn J. F. (2005). Deciphering the enigmatic face: The importance of facial dynamics in interpreting subtle facial expressions. Psychol. Sci. 16 403–410. 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01548.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anderson G. (2017). Walmart’s Facial Recognition Tech Would Overstep Boundaries. Forbes. Available online at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/retailwire/2017/07/27/walmarts-facial-recog... (Accessed March 24, 2020).
    1. Baltrusaitis T., Robinson P., Morency L.-P. (2016). “OpenFace: An open source facial behavior analysis toolkit,” in Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), (Lake Placid, NY: IEEE; ), 1–10. 10.1109/WACV.2016.7477553 - DOI
    1. Barrett L. F., Adolphs R., Marsella S., Martinez A. M., Pollak S. D. (2019). Emotional expressions reconsidered: Challenges to inferring emotion from human facial movements. Psychol. Sci. Public Interest 20 1–68. 10.1177/1529100619832930 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beringer M., Spohn F., Hildebrandt A., Wacker J., Recio G. (2019). Reliability and validity of machine vision for the assessment of facial expressions. Cogn. Syst. Res. 56 119–132. 10.1016/j.cogsys.2019.03.009 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources