Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Apr 28:11:323.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00323. eCollection 2020.

The Effects of Workplace Nature-Based Interventions on the Mental Health and Well-Being of Employees: A Systematic Review

Susan Gritzka  1   2 , Tadhg E MacIntyre  1 , Denise Dörfel  2 , Jordan L Baker-Blanc  3 , Giovanna Calogiuri  4
Affiliations

The Effects of Workplace Nature-Based Interventions on the Mental Health and Well-Being of Employees: A Systematic Review

Susan Gritzka et al. Front Psychiatry. .

Abstract

Mental health in the workplace is a societal challenge with serious economical and human costs. Most prevalent mental disorders in the workforce (e.g., depression), however, are preventable. There is widespread agreement about the favorable effects of nature exposure and consequently, nature-based interventions (NBI) in the workplace have been proposed as a cost-effective approach to promote good health among employees. The objective of the present study was to systematically review scientific evidence on the effectiveness of NBI to promote mental health and well-being among actual employees in actual workplace settings. The review was conducted and presented in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. The literature search was performed on five databases (PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, CINHAL, and PsycINFO), hand-searching of field-specific journals, and the reference lists of retrieved papers over the past 5 years up to November (13th, 2018). Studies were eligible for inclusion if they (i) were randomized or nonrandomized controlled trials; (ii) comprised samples of actual employees; (iii) implemented a workplace-based intervention with exposure to nature; (iv) included comparison conditions that displayed a clear contrast to NBIs; and (v) investigated the quantitative effects on mental health or well-being. No restrictions on type of employees or workplace, publication period, or language of the publication were set. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane's RoB2 tool. Narrative synthesis was performed due to large heterogeneity in outcome variables. Of the 510 articles identified, 10 NBIs (nine papers) met the eligibility criteria. The outcomes were grouped in five categories: (i) mental health indices, (ii) cognitive ability, (iii) recovery and restoration, (iv) work and life satisfaction, and (v) psychophysiological indicators. Narrative synthesis indicates consistently positive effects on mental health indices and cognitive ability, while mixed results were found for the other outcome categories. Caution must be given when interpreting the current evidence in this emerging research field because of the diversity of NBIs and the overall high risk of bias in the individual studies. Although in this field often researchers have to balance scientific rigor and ecological validity, there is a need for large, well-designed and rigorously conducted trials grounded in contemporary theories.

Keywords: employees; environmental psychology; green exercise; health promotion; mental health; occupational health; occupational psychology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flow diagram of study selection and identification.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Percentages summary of risk-of-bias assessment using the RoB 2 tool.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Risk of bias assessment for the category mental health indices.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Risk of bias assessment for the category cognitive ability.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Risk of bias assessment for the category recovery and restoration.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Risk of bias assessment for the category work and life satisfaction.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Risk of bias assessment for the category psychophysiological indicators of health.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Goetzel RZ, Roemer EC, Holingue C, Fallin MD, McCleary K, Eaton W, et al. Mental health in the workplace: A call to action proceedings from the mental health in the workplace: Public health summit. J Occup Environ Med (2018) 60(4):322. 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001271 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Landy FJ, Conte JM. Work in the 21st century, Binder ready version: An introduction to Industrial and Organizational Psychology. 6th ed. Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons; (2016).
    1. Weiten W, Dunn DS, Hammer EY. Psychology applied to modern life: Adjustment in the 21st century. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth: Cengage Learning; (2014).
    1. Blustein DL, Gill NJ, Kenna AC, Murphy KA. The psychology of working: A new perspective for career development. Career Plann Adult Dev J (2005) 21(4):10. 10.4324/9780203935477 - DOI
    1. Harvey SB, Modini M, Joyce S, Milligan-Saville JS, Tan L, Mykletun A, et al. Can work make you mentally ill? A systematic meta-review of work-related risk factors for common mental health problems. Occup Environ Med (2017) 74(4):301–10. 10.1136/oemed-2016-104015 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types