Filling the Public Health Science Gaps for Diabetes With Natural Experiments

Affiliations

¹ Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College, London, UK.
² Division of General Internal Medicine, Health Services Research, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
³ Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA.
⁴ Division of Diabetes Translation, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
⁵ Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology, and Metabolic Diseases, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
⁶ Patient Centers Research Institute, Washington, DC.
⁷ Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.

Editorial

Edward W Gregg et al. Med Care. 2020 Jun.

. 2020 Jun:58 Suppl 6 Suppl 1:S1-S3.

doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001330.

¹ Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College, London, UK.
² Division of General Internal Medicine, Health Services Research, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
³ Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA.
⁴ Division of Diabetes Translation, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
⁵ Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology, and Metabolic Diseases, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
⁶ Patient Centers Research Institute, Washington, DC.
⁷ Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.

No abstract available

References

1. Haw JS, Galaviz KI, Straus AN, et al. Long-term sustainability of diabetes prevention approaches: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177:1808–1817.
1. Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. BMJ. 1998;317:703–713.
1. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Lancet. 1998;352:837–853.
1. Ali MK, Echouffo-Tcheugui J, Williamson DF. How effective were lifestyle interventions in real-world settings that were modeled on the Diabetes Prevention Program? Health Aff (Millwood). 2012;31:67–75.
1. Tricco AC, Ivers NM, Grimshaw JM, et al. Effectiveness of quality improvement strategies on the management of diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2012;379:2252–2261.