The Surgical Approach to Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy and Concurrent Hysterectomy: Trends for the Past Decade
- PMID: 32412972
- DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000891
The Surgical Approach to Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy and Concurrent Hysterectomy: Trends for the Past Decade
Abstract
Objective: The aim of the study was to understand the surgical trends and 30-day complications of patients undergoing an abdominal sacrocolpopexy with a concurrent hysterectomy.
Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of surgical cases from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program from 2010 to 2017 who underwent an abdominal sacrocolpopexy and a concurrent hysterectomy.
Results: There were 9327 surgical cases of an abdominal sacrocolpopexy with a concurrent hysterectomy of which 7772 (83.3%) were minimally invasive and 1555 (16.7%) were through a laparotomy. The proportion of patients undergoing a laparotomy decreased by 2.4% per year from 2010 to 2018 (R2 = 0.77). Among minimally invasive procedures, 4359 (46.7%) involved a concurrent supracervical hysterectomy and 4968 (53.3%) involved a concurrent total hysterectomy. Among minimally invasive procedures, patients who had a concurrent supracervical hysterectomy both had a longer operative time and were more likely to be admitted at least 2 days postoperatively compared with those who had a concurrent total hysterectomy (P < 0.001 for both).
Conclusions: Patients undergoing an abdominal sacrocolpopexy and concurrent hysterectomy are increasingly likely to undergo surgery in a minimally invasive approach. The Food and Drug Administration safety communication on electric power morcellation did not impact this trend. Although complication rates are low, regardless of the type of concurrent hysterectomy, some complications, such as blood transfusions and surgical site infections, seem to be highest for those undergoing a concurrent total hysterectomy despite the fact that a concurrent supracervical hysterectomy may be associated with a longer operative time and longer hospital admission.
Copyright © 2020 American Urogynecologic Society. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
A.M.M. is a paid statistical consultant for Tissue Regenix and Renovia Inc. The other authors have declared they have no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Nezhat CH, Nezhat F, Nezhat C. Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 1994;84(5):885–888.
-
- Elliott DS, Krambeck AE, Chow GK. Long-term results of robotic assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of high grade vaginal vault prolapse. J Urol 2006;176(2):655–659.
-
- Linder BJ, Occhino JA, Habermann EB, et al. A national contemporary analysis of perioperative outcomes of open versus minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy. J Urol 2018;200(4):862–867.
-
- Elterman DS, Chughtai BI, Vertosick E, et al. Changes in pelvic organ prolapse surgery in the last decade among United States urologists. J Urol 2014;191(4):1022–1027.
-
- Meriwether KV, Antosh DD, Olivera CK, et al. Uterine preservation vs hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018;219(2):129–146.e2.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
