Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 May;20(3):319-323.
doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2019-0454.

The impact of the Tracey judgment on the rates and outcomes of in-hospital cardiac arrests in UK hospitals participating in the National Cardiac Arrest Audit

Zohra Zenasni  1 , Emily C Reynolds  2 , David A Harrison  1 , Kathryn M Rowan  1 , Jerry P Nolan  3 , Jasmeet Soar  4 , Gary B Smith  5
Affiliations

The impact of the Tracey judgment on the rates and outcomes of in-hospital cardiac arrests in UK hospitals participating in the National Cardiac Arrest Audit

Zohra Zenasni et al. Clin Med (Lond). 2020 May.

Abstract

Aims: The aim was to determine if the 17 June 2014 Tracey judgment regarding 'do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation' decisions led to increases in the rate of in-hospital cardiac arrests resulting in a resuscitation attempt (IHCA) and/or proportion of resuscitation attempts deemed futile.

Method: Using UK National Cardiac Arrest Audit data, the IHCA rate and proportion of resuscitation attempts deemed futile were compared for two periods (pre-judgment (01 July 2012 - 16 June 2014, inclusive) and post-judgment (01 July 2014 - 30 June 2016, inclusive)) using interrupted time series analyses.

Results: A total of 43,109 IHCAs (115 hospitals) were analysed. There were fewer IHCAs post- than pre-judgment (21,324 vs 21,785, respectively). The IHCA rate was declining over time before the judgment but there was an abrupt and statistically significant increase in the period immediately following the judgment (p<0.001). This was not sustained post-judgment. The proportion of resuscitation attempts deemed futile was smaller post-judgment than pre-judgment (8.2% vs 14.9%, respectively). The rate of attempts deemed futile decreased post-judgment (p<0.001).

Conclusion: The IHCA rate increased immediately after the Tracey judgment while the proportion of resuscitation attempts deemed futile decreased. The precise mechanisms for these changes are unclear.

Keywords: DNACPR; Resuscitation; Tracey judgment; cardiac arrest; do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1.
Fig 1.
Interrupted time series analysis showing the impact of the Tracey judgment (published on 17 June 2014) on the rate of IHCAs per 1,000 hospital admissions. IHCAs = in-hospital cardiac arrests resulting in a resuscitation attempt.
Fig 2.
Fig 2.
Plot of the proportion of IHCAs per month by reason resuscitation stopped. IHCAs = in-hospital cardiac arrests resulting in a resuscitation attempt; No ROSC = no return of spontaneous circulation; Pre-existing DNACPR = documented valid do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation notice was discovered after cardiopulmonary resuscitation had commenced; Resuscitation attempt deemed futile = resuscitation attempts were deemed futile after arrival of the resuscitation team; ROSC <20 minutes = return of spontaneous circulation sustained for less than 20 minutes; ROSC >20 minutes = return of spontaneous circulation sustained for more than 20 minutes.
Fig 3.
Fig 3.
Interrupted time series analysis showing the impact of the Tracey judgment (published on 17 June 2014) on the proportion of resuscitation attempts deemed futile.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. R (Tracey) v Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust & Others: [2014] EWCA Civ 822. Royal Courts of Justice, 2014. www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/tracey-approved.pdf [Accessed 11 March 2019].
    1. Mockford C, Fritz Z, George R, et al. Do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DNACPR) orders: A systematic review of the barriers and facilitators of decision-making and implementation. Resuscitation 2015;88:99–113. - PubMed
    1. Nicolasora N, Pannala R, Mountantonakis S, et al. If asked, hospitalized patients will choose whether to receive life-sustaining therapies. J Hosp Med 2006;1:161–7. - PubMed
    1. Gorton AJ, Jayanthi NVG, Lepping P, Scriven MW. Patients’ attitudes towards ‘do not attempt resuscitation’ status. J Med Ethics 2008;34:624–6. - PubMed
    1. Giles H, Moule P. Do not attempt resuscitation’ decision-making: a study exploring the attitudes and experiences of nurses. Nurs Crit Care 2004;9:115–22. - PubMed