Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 May 15;30(4):373-379.
doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055454. Online ahead of print.

Global review of tobacco product flavour policies

Affiliations

Global review of tobacco product flavour policies

Olufemi Erinoso et al. Tob Control. .

Abstract

Objective: We determined which countries prohibit flavoured tobacco products and the details of those restrictions in order to identify possible gaps and opportunities for these and other countries to address.

Methods: We reviewed the grey literature, scanned news articles and consulted with key informants and identified 11 countries and the European Union (EU) that ban or restrict tobacco product flavours. We reviewed policy documents for their stated policy rationale, terms and definitions of flavours, tobacco products covered and restrictions on the use of flavour imagery and terms on tobacco product packaging.

Results: Countries with a tobacco product flavour policy include the USA, Canada, Brazil, Ethiopia, Uganda, Senegal, Niger, Mauritania, EU (28 Member States), Moldova, Turkey and Singapore. Most of the countries' policies provide a rationale of dissuading youth from taking up tobacco use. Ten of the 12 policies use the terms 'flavours' (n=6) or 'characterising flavours' (n=4). Six policies cover all products made entirely or partly of tobacco leaf. Countries consistently prohibit flavours associated with fruits, vanilla and spices. The USA and Niger make an exception for menthol, while Mauritania and Uganda do not specify the scope of flavours or ingredients covered by their policies. Eight policies make no specific reference to restricting flavour descriptors on tobacco product packaging.

Conclusion: Countries looking to implement policies restricting flavours in tobacco products can build on existing comprehensive policies. Future research could examine the implementation and impacts of these policies, to inform other countries interested in acting in this policy domain.

Keywords: global health; low/middle income country; public policy; tobacco industry.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Timeline for enactment of flavour policies by country and the EU. EU, European Union; RYO, roll-your-own; TPD, Tobacco Products Directive.

References

    1. Huang L-L, Baker HM, Meernik C, et al. . Impact of non-menthol flavours in tobacco products on perceptions and use among youth, young adults and adults: a systematic review. Tob Control 2017;26:709–19. 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053196 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Feirman SP, Lock D, Cohen JE, et al. . Flavored tobacco products in the United States: a systematic review assessing use and attitudes. Nicotine Tob Res 2016;18:739–49. 10.1093/ntr/ntv176 - DOI - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization (WHO) . Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. the United nations Treaty collection, 2005. Available: https://treaties.un.org/pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IX-4&... [Accessed 18 Feb 2019].
    1. World Health Organization (WHO) . Partial guidelines for implementation of articles 9 and 10, 2017. Available: http://www.who.int/fctc/treaty_instruments/guidelines_articles_9_10_2017... [Accessed 18 Feb 2019].
    1. Carpenter CM, Wayne GF, Pauly JL, et al. . New cigarette brands with flavors that appeal to youth: tobacco marketing strategies. Health Aff 2005;24:1601–10. 10.1377/hlthaff.24.6.1601 - DOI - PubMed