Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep;74(9):698-704.
doi: 10.1136/jech-2020-213885. Epub 2020 May 15.

Why does Russia have such high cardiovascular mortality rates? Comparisons of blood-based biomarkers with Norway implicate non-ischaemic cardiac damage

Affiliations

Why does Russia have such high cardiovascular mortality rates? Comparisons of blood-based biomarkers with Norway implicate non-ischaemic cardiac damage

Olena Lakunchykova et al. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Russia has one of the highest rates of mortality from cardiovascular disease (CVD). At age 35-69 years, they are eight times higher than in neighbouring Norway. Comparing profiles of blood-based CVD biomarkers between these two populations can help identify reasons for this substantial difference in risk.

Methods: We compared age-standardised mean levels of CVD biomarkers for men and women aged 40-69 years measured in two cross-sectional population-based studies: Know Your Heart (KYH) (Russia, 2015-2018; n=4046) and the seventh wave of the Tromsø Study (Tromsø 7) (Norway, 2015-2018; n=17 646). A laboratory calibration study was performed to account for inter-laboratory differences.

Results: Levels of total, low-density lipoprotein-, high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol and triglycerides were comparable in KYH and Tromsø 7 studies. N-terminal pro-b-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) were higher in KYH compared with Tromsø 7 (NT-proBNP was higher by 54.1% (95% CI 41.5% to 67.8%) in men and by 30.8% (95% CI 22.9% to 39.2%) in women; hs-cTnT-by 42.4% (95% CI 36.1% to 49.0%) in men and by 68.1% (95% CI 62.4% to 73.9%) in women; hsCRP-by 33.3% (95% CI 26.1% to 40.8%) in men and by 35.6% (95% CI 29.0% to 42.6%) in women). Exclusion of participants with pre-existing coronary heart disease (279 men and 282 women) had no substantive effect.

Conclusions: Differences in cholesterol fractions cannot explain the difference in CVD mortality rate between Russia and Norway. A non-ischemic pathway to the cardiac damage reflected by raised NT-proBNP and hs-cTnT is likely to contribute to high CVD mortality in Russia.

Keywords: Biostatistics; CHD/Coronary heart; Cardiovascular disease; Cohort studies; Epidemiological methods; Epidemiology; Epidemiology of cardiovascular disease; Gender; Health inequalities; Pharmacoepidemiology; Prescribing; Seasonal; Statistics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Townsend N, Wilson L, Bhatnagar P, et al. Cardiovascular disease in Europe: epidemiological update 2016. Eur Heart J 2016;37:3232–45. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw334 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grigoriev P, Meslé F, Shkolnikov VM, et al. The recent mortality decline in Russia: beginning of the cardiovascular revolution? Popul Dev Rev 2014;40:107–29. 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2014.00652.x - DOI
    1. Nikitin YP, Makarenkova KV, Malyutina SK, et al. [Blood lipid parameters in populations of Russia, Poland and Czech Republic: the Hapiee Study]. Kardiologiia 2015;55:34–9. 10.18565/cardio.2015.5.34-39 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shestov DB, Deev AD, Klimov AN, et al. Increased risk of coronary heart disease death in men with low total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in the Russian Lipid Research Clinics Prevalence Follow-up Study. Circulation 1993;88:846–53. 10.1161/01.CIR.88.3.846 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Averina M, Nilssen O, Brenn T, et al. High cardiovascular mortality in Russia cannot be explained by the classical risk factors. The Arkhangelsk Study 2000. Eur J Epidemiol 2003;18:871–8. 10.1023/A:1025626202235 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types