Clinical Significance of Spontaneous Portosystemic Shunts in Living Donor Liver Transplantation
- PMID: 32416038
- DOI: 10.1002/lt.25798
Clinical Significance of Spontaneous Portosystemic Shunts in Living Donor Liver Transplantation
Abstract
Spontaneous portosystemic shunts (SPSS) are commonly observed in patients undergoing living donor liver transplantation (LDLT); however, their impact on the outcome after transplantation is unclear. We aimed to assess the type, size, and the effects of SPSS on outcomes after LDLT. A total of 339 LDLT recipients in a single institution were included. The type and diameter of the SPSS (splenorenal shunt [SRS], oesogastric shunt, and umbilical shunt) were retrospectively analyzed. A large shunt was defined as having a diameter ≤7 mm. No portal flow modulation was attempted over time. Portal complications were defined as stenosis, thrombosis, or hepatofugal flow requiring any treatment after transplantation. There were 202 (59.0%) patients who exhibited at least 1 large SPSS. Neither the size nor type of SPSS was associated with mortality, morbidity, or liver function recovery. However, the incidence of portal complications was significantly higher in patients with a large SRS (8.6% versus 2.9%; P = 0.04). Multivariate analysis of portal complications revealed 2 independent predictors: pre-LT portal vein thrombosis (PVT) and SRS size. The observed risk among recipients with pre-LT PVT was 8.3% when the SRS was ≤7 mm, but increased to 38.5% when the SRS was >15 mm. The present study suggests that large SPSS do not negatively affect the outcomes after LDLT. However, a large SRS is associated with a higher risk of portal complications, particularly in recipients with pre-LT PVT, for whom intraoperative intervention for SRS should be considered. Otherwise, a conservative approach to SPSS during LDLT seems reasonable.
Copyright © 2020 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.
Comment in
-
Clinical Significance of Spontaneous Portosystemic Shunts in Living Donor Liver Transplantation.Liver Transpl. 2021 Feb;27(2):301-302. doi: 10.1002/lt.25822. Epub 2020 Jul 22. Liver Transpl. 2021. PMID: 32558099 No abstract available.
-
Reply.Liver Transpl. 2021 Feb;27(2):303-304. doi: 10.1002/lt.25839. Epub 2020 Aug 9. Liver Transpl. 2021. PMID: 32609917 No abstract available.
References
-
- Chen CL, Kabiling CS, Concejero AM. Why does living donor liver transplantation flourish in Asia? Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013;10:746–751.
-
- Lee SG. A complete treatment of adult living donor liver transplantation: a review of surgical technique and current challenges to expand indication of patients. Am J Transplant 2015;15:17–38.
-
- Cheah YL, Simpson MA, Pomposelli JJ, Pomfret EA. Incidence of death and potentially life‐threatening near‐miss events in living donor hepatic lobectomy: a world‐wide survey. Liver Transpl 2013;19:499–506.
-
- Ikegami T, Shirabe K, Nakagawara H, Yoshizumi T, Toshima T, Soejima Y, et al. Obstructing spontaneous major shunt vessels is mandatory to keep adequate portal inflow in living‐donor liver transplantation. Transplantation 2013;95:1270–1277.
-
- Kim SH, Lee JM, Choi JY, Suh KS, Yi NJ, Han JK, et al. Changes of portosystemic collaterals and splenic volume on CT after liver transplantation and factors influencing those changes. Am J Roentgenol 2008;191:W8–W16.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical