Clinical outcome of high-intensity focused ultrasound as the preoperative management of cesarean scar pregnancy
- PMID: 32416885
- DOI: 10.1016/j.tjog.2020.03.009
Clinical outcome of high-intensity focused ultrasound as the preoperative management of cesarean scar pregnancy
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the feasibility and safety of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) treatment as the preoperative management of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP).
Materials and methods: 225 patients with definite Type I CSP were treated with suction curettage under hysteroscopic guidance. Among them, 103 patients chose HIFU treatment before hysteroscopy (assign to the HIFU group), and the other 122 patients without any pretreatment before hysteroscopy to the control group. The successful rate, volume of intraoperative blood loss, time for serum β-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) level returned to normal, gestational sac disappeared, normal menstrual recovery, and adverse effects were collected and analyzed to compare the two approaches.
Results: The successful rate (98.06%) in the HIFU group was higher than that (91.80%) in the contrast group. The median ablation time was 39 min and the median HIFU sonication time was 106.6 s. The median volume of intraoperative blood loss in the HIFU group was lower than that in the contrast group (P < 0.001), and the median time of gestational sac disappeared in the HIFU group was shorter than that in the contrast group. There were no statistically significant differences in the time of serum β-hCG returned to normal and days of menstrual recovery between the 2 groups.
Conclusion: Based on our results, it appears that HIFU ablation is a safe and effective modality as pre-treatment before hysteroscopy in the management of CSP.
Keywords: Cesarean section; High-intensity focused ultrasound; Hysteroscopy.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Similar articles
-
High-intensity focused ultrasound combined with suction curettage for the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy.Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 May;94(18):e854. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000854. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015. PMID: 25950698 Free PMC article.
-
Outcome of high-intensity focused ultrasound and uterine artery embolization in the treatment and management of cesarean scar pregnancy: A retrospective study.Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Jul;96(30):e7687. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007687. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017. PMID: 28746234 Free PMC article.
-
Reducing intraoperative hemorrhage in type II caesarean scar pregnancy: a study protocol comparing high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) pretreatment vs. hysteroscopy-guided suction curettage-an open-label, 1:1 parallel-group, superiority-design investigator-initiated trial (IIT).Trials. 2025 Aug 6;26(1):275. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-08967-8. Trials. 2025. PMID: 40770352 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound and Uterine Artery Embolization in Caesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Meta-analysis.Adv Ther. 2019 Jun;36(6):1314-1325. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-00959-w. Epub 2019 May 2. Adv Ther. 2019. PMID: 31049875
-
Efficacy and Safety of High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Compared with Uterine Artery Embolization in Cesarean Section Pregnancy: A Meta-analysis.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2023 Jun;30(6):446-454. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2023.02.021. Epub 2023 Mar 7. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2023. PMID: 36893898 Review.
Cited by
-
Review of Robot-Assisted HIFU Therapy.Sensors (Basel). 2023 Apr 3;23(7):3707. doi: 10.3390/s23073707. Sensors (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37050766 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of scar pregnancy.Pak J Med Sci. 2022 Sep-Oct;38(7):1743-1747. doi: 10.12669/pjms.38.7.6288. Pak J Med Sci. 2022. PMID: 36246696 Free PMC article.
-
The effectiveness of single ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (USgHIFU) ablation in managing placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorder.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Apr;307(4):1037-1045. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06840-6. Epub 2022 Dec 16. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023. PMID: 36525091
-
Selection of Laparoscopy or Laparotomy for Treating Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Retrospective Study.Int J Gen Med. 2022 Sep 13;15:7229-7240. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S369884. eCollection 2022. Int J Gen Med. 2022. PMID: 36124106 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical