Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun 30;10(5):503–512.
doi: 10.1177/2048872620926681. Epub 2020 May 18.

Difference in the in-hospital prognosis between ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with high Killip class: Data from the Japan Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry

Affiliations

Difference in the in-hospital prognosis between ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with high Killip class: Data from the Japan Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry

Motoki Fukutomi et al. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. .

Abstract

Background: ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction is known to be associated with worse short-term outcome than non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. However, whether or not this trend holds true in patients with a high Killip class has been unclear.

Methods: We analyzed 3704 acute myocardial infarction patients with Killip II-IV class from the Japan Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry and compared the short-term outcomes between ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (n = 2943) and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (n = 761). In addition, we also performed the same analysis in different age subgroups: <80 years and ≥80 years.

Results: In the overall population, there were no significant difference in the in-hospital mortality (20.0% vs 17.1%, p = 0.065) between ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction groups. Patients <80 years of age also showed no difference in the in-hospital mortality (15.7% vs 15.2%, p = 0.807) between ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (n = 2001) and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (n = 453) groups, whereas among those ≥80 years of age, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (n = 942) was associated with significantly higher in-hospital mortality (29.3% vs 19.8%, p = 0.001) and in-hospital cardiac mortality (23.3% vs 15.0%, p = 0.002) than non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (n = 308). After adjusting for covariates, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction was a significant predictor for in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 2.117; 95% confidence interval, 1.204-3.722; p = 0.009) in patients ≥80 years of age.

Conclusion: Among cases of acute myocardial infarction with a high Killip class, there was no marked difference in the short-term outcomes between ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in younger patients, while ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction showed worse short-term outcomes in elderly patients than non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Future study identifying the prognostic factors for the specific anticipation intensive cares is needed in this high-risk group.

Keywords: Elderly; ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; high Killip class; non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; outcome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of patients in the study analyses. AMI: acute myocardial infarction; JAMIR: Japan Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry; NSTEMI: non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; STEMI: ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
Figure 2
Figure 2
In-hospital outcomes in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-STEMI (NSTEMI) among different Killip classes.
Figure 3
Figure 3
In-hospital outcomes in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-STEMI (NSTEMI) among different age groups.

References

    1. DeGeare VS, Boura JA, Grines LL, et al.Predictive value of the Killip classification in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 2001;87:1035–1038. - PubMed
    1. Khot UN, Jia G, Moliterno DJ, et al.Prognostic importance of physical examination for heart failure in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: The enduring value of Killip classification. JAMA 2003;290:2174–2181. - PubMed
    1. Bahit MC, Lopes RD, Clare RM, et al.Heart failure complicating non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: Timing, predictors, and clinical outcomes. JACC Heart Fail 2013;1:223–229. - PubMed
    1. Kunadian V, Qiu W, Ludman P, et al.Outcomes in patients with cardiogenic shock following percutaneous coronary intervention in the contemporary era: An analysis from the BCIS database (British Cardiovascular Intervention Society). JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2014;7:1374–1385. - PubMed
    1. Nishihira K, Kojima S, Takegami M, et al.Clinical characteristics and in-hospital mortality according to left main and non-left main culprit lesions – report from the Japan Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry (JAMIR). Circ Rep 2019;1:601–609. - PMC - PubMed