Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2020 Jun 2;9(11):e015730.
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.015730. Epub 2020 May 16.

Development of a Novel Adult Congenital Heart Disease-Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Metric

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Development of a Novel Adult Congenital Heart Disease-Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Metric

Ari M Cedars et al. J Am Heart Assoc. .

Abstract

Background Patient-reported outcome metrics (PROs) quantify important outcomes in clinical trials and can be sensitive measures of patient experience in clinical practice. Currently, there is no validated disease-specific PRO for adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD). Methods and Results We conducted a preliminary psychometric validation of a novel ACHD PRO. ACHD patients were recruited prospectively from 2 institutions and completed a series of questionnaires, a physician health assessment, and a 6-minute walk test. Participants returned to complete the same questionnaires and assessment 3 months±2 weeks later. We tested the internal consistency and test-retest reliability by comparing responses among clinically stable patients at the 2 study visits. We assessed convergent and divergent validity by comparison of ACHD PRO responses to existing validated questionnaires. We assessed responsiveness by comparison with patient-reported clinical change. One hundred three patients completed 1 study visit and 81 completed both. The ACHD PRO demonstrated good internal consistency in each of its 5 domains (Cronbach's α: 0.87; 0.74; 0.74; 0.90; and 0.89, respectively) and in the overall summary score (0.92). Test-retest reliability was good with an intraclass correlation ≥0.73 for all domains and 0.78 for the Summary Score. The ACHD PRO accurately assessed domain concepts based on comparison with validated standards. Preliminary estimates of responsiveness suggest sensitivity to clinical status. Conclusions These studies provide initial support for the validity and reliability of the ACHD PRO. Further studies are needed to assess its sensitivity to changes in clinical status.

Keywords: adult congenital heart disease; patient‐reported health status; patient‐reported outcome metric; quality of life.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Graphic depiction of the iterative stages in patient‐reported outcome metric development as recommended by the US Food and Drug Administration.
The present work is a part of the third step in development according to this process. ACHD indicates adult congenital heart disease; PRO, patient‐reported outcome metric.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Relationship between patient‐reported change in clinical status as assessed by 15‐item Likert scale and ACHD PRO Summary Score; ρ=0.24, P=0.031.
ACHD PRO indicates adult congenital heart disease patient‐reported outcome metric.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Green CP, Porter CB, Bresnahan DR, Spertus JA. Development and evaluation of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire: a new health status measure for heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;35:1245–1255. - PubMed
    1. Mommersteeg PMC, Denollet J, Spertus JA, Pedersen SS. Health status as a risk factor in cardiovascular disease: a systematic review of current evidence. Am Heart J. 2009;157:208–218. - PubMed
    1. Cedars AM, Spertus JA. Call for a disease‐specific patient‐reported outcome tool in adult congenital heart disease. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2014;7:971–974. - PubMed
    1. Gurvitz M, Marelli A, Mangione‐Smith R, Jenkins K. Building quality indicators to improve care for adults with congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:2244–2253. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Spertus JA. Evolving applications for patient‐centered health status measures. Circulation. 2008;118:2103–2110. - PubMed

MeSH terms