Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 May 6:14:1035.
doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2020.1035. eCollection 2020.

Fertility preservation in women affected by gynaecological cancer: the importance of an integrated gynaecological and psychological approach

Affiliations
Review

Fertility preservation in women affected by gynaecological cancer: the importance of an integrated gynaecological and psychological approach

Valentina Lucia La Rosa et al. Ecancermedicalscience. .

Abstract

Gynaecological cancer treatment significantly affects the fertility of women in reproductive age. Surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy are the mainstays of ovarian, cervical and endometrial cancers and anatomically or functionally impact the uterus and ovaries. Moreover, the sexual function and psychological wellbeing of patients are highly weakened after a cancer diagnosis: depression, anxiety and impairment of quality of life represent a relevant concern for patient care. The potential loss of fertility could be more distressing than cancer itself. For this reason, it is of paramount importance to try to preserve fertility in women affected by gynaecological cancers. Recently, tailored fertility preservation therapies have been developed to meet the childbearing demand from more than half of women between 18 and 40 years with a diagnosis of cancer. Currently, fertility preservation techniques play a significant role in improving the quality of life of women with gynaecological cancer. In this scenario, we propose a narrative overview of the recent literature about the importance of a multidisciplinary approach in the management of fertility preservation in the case of gynaecological cancers.

Keywords: cervical cancer; endometrial cancer; fertility preservation; fertility-sparing surgery; gynecological cancer; ovarian cancer; quality of life; reproduction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, et al. Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources and methods. Int J Cancer. 2019;144(8):1941–1953. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31937. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vitale SG, Capriglione S, Zito G, et al. Management of endometrial, ovarian and cervical cancer in the elderly: current approach to a challenging condition. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019;299(2):299–315. doi: 10.1007/s00404-018-5006-z. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vitale SG, Rossetti D, Tropea A, et al. Fertility sparing surgery for stage IA type I and G2 endometrial cancer in reproductive-aged patients: evidence-based approach and future perspectives. Updates Surg. 2017;69(1):29–34. doi: 10.1007/s13304-017-0419-y. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carneiro MM, Lamaita RM, Ferreira MCF, et al. Fertility-preservation in endometrial cancer: is it safe? Review of the literature. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2016;20(4):232–239. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20160045. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cignini P, Vitale SG, Laganà AS, et al. Preoperative work-up for definition of lymph node risk involvement in early stage endometrial cancer: 5-year follow-up. Updates Surg. 2017;69(1):75–82. doi: 10.1007/s13304-017-0418-z. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources