Epidemiology of long-stay patients in the pediatric intensive care unit: prevalence, characteristics, resource consumption and complications
- PMID: 32421088
- PMCID: PMC7223791
- DOI: 10.1007/s10389-020-01282-3
Epidemiology of long-stay patients in the pediatric intensive care unit: prevalence, characteristics, resource consumption and complications
Abstract
Background: The impact of pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) utilization and resource consumption among long-stay patients has not been characterized recently. This study aimed to describe the resource consumption and characteristics of long-stay patients in a PICU.
Methods: This was a single-center descriptive cohort study of 1309 patients admitted to a PICU in 2017. The main outcome was ICU length of stay (LOS). Patients were divided into prolonged LOS (PLS) and non-PLS groups if they had an LOS of ≥ 28 or < 28 days, respectively. Two groups were compared to characterize PLS.
Results: Thirty-two (2.4%) patients had a PLS and utilized 33% of PICU bed days. Factors associated with PLS with odds ratio [95% confidence interval (CI)] were being a neonate (7.8 [2.5-25.4], p = <0.001), being an infant (2.9 [1.0-9.0], p = 0.04), admission for a respiratory ailment (7.3 [1.6-44.2], p = 0.003), cardiovascular dysfunction (24.1 [4.8-152.1], p = <0.001), post-cardiac operation (8.0 [1.7-50.1], p = 0.003), post-cardiopulmonary arrest (22.8 [1.7-211.9], p = 0.01), and transfer from another facility (4.2 [1.8-10.7], p = 0.001). PLS patients developed more nosocomial infections and disproportionately received monitoring and therapeutic resources.
Conclusions: A PLS was associated with substantial PICU utilization and complication rates. Future studies should aim to alleviate both institutional and patient-related issues in the affected population harboring possible risk factors for PLS.
Keywords: Complication; Long stay; Pediatric intensive care; Resource utilization; Risk factor.
© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interestThe authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Balas MC, Burke WJ, Gannon D, Cohen MZ, Colburn L, Bevil C, Franz D, Olsen KM, Ely EW, Vasilevskis EE. Implementing the awakening and breathing coordination, delirium monitoring/management, and early exercise/mobility bundle into everyday care: opportunities, challenges, and lessons learned for implementing the ICU pain, agitation, and delirium guidelines. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(9 Suppl 1):S116–S127. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182a17064. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Barnett AG, Page K, Campbell M, Martin E, Rashleigh-Rolls R, Halton K, Paterson DL, Hall L, Jimmieson N, White K, Graves N. The increased risks of death and extra lengths of hospital and ICU stay from hospital-acquired bloodstream infections: a case-control study. BMJ Open. 2013;3(10):e003587. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003587. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources