Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 16;11(2):441-451.
doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibaa042.

Strategies of community engagement in research: definitions and classifications

Affiliations

Strategies of community engagement in research: definitions and classifications

Vetta L Sanders Thompson et al. Transl Behav Med. .

Abstract

Engagement activities are defined along a continuum that analyzes and represents nonacademic stakeholder activities and interactions with academic researchers. Proposed continua begin with none to limited stakeholder inclusion and input into research and continue with descriptions of increasing presence, input, and participation in decision-making. Despite some agreement in the literature, development of consistent terminology and definitions has been recommended to promote the common understanding of strategies in engaged research. This paper sought to develop and understand classifications and definitions of community-engaged research that can serve as the foundation of a measure of engaged research that permits comparisons among engagement strategies and the outcomes that they produce in health- and healthcare-related research studies. Data on academic and stakeholder perceptions and understandings of classifications and definitions were obtained using Delphi process (N = 19) via online and face-to-face survey and cognitive response interviews (N = 16). Participants suggested the need for more nuanced understanding of engagement along portions of the continuum, with active involvement and decision-making as engagement progressed. Cognitive interview responses suggested that outreach and education is a more advanced level of engagement than previously discussed in the literature and viewed consultation negatively because it required work without guaranteeing community benefit. It is possible to define a continuum of patient- and community-engaged research that is understood and accepted by both academic researchers and community members. However, future research should revisit the understanding and depiction of the strategies that are to be used in measure development.

Keywords: Community-based participatory research; Community-engaged research; community engagement; patient engagement; patient-engaged research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Change of categories in continuum of community-engaged research, Rounds 2–5 of Delphi panel.
Fig 2
Fig 2
Recommended portrayal of continuum of community-engaged research interactions.

References

    1. Eccles MP, Mittman BS. Welcome to implementation science. Implement Sci. 2006;1(1). doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-1-1 - DOI
    1. Feldstein AC, Glasgow RE. A practical, robust implementation and sustainability model (PRISM) for integrating research findings into practice. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2008;34(4):228–243. - PubMed
    1. Grimshaw JM, Eccles MP, Lavis JN, Hill SJ, Squires JE. Knowledge translation of research findings. Implement Sci. 2012;7(1):50. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kost RG, Reider C, Stephens J, Schuff KG. Research subject advocacy: program implementation and evaluation at clinical and translational science award centers. Acad Med. 2012;87(9):1228–1236. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wilkins CH, Spofford M, Williams N, et al. ; CTSA Consortium’s Community Engagement Key Function Committee Community Partners Integration Workgroup . Community representatives’ involvement in clinical and translational science awardee activities. Clin Transl Sci. 2013;6(4):292–296. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types