Pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality during intra-hospital transport
- PMID: 32422246
- PMCID: PMC7321865
- DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.05.003
Pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality during intra-hospital transport
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) quality during intra-hospital transport to facilitate extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)-CPR (ECPR). We compared chest compression (CC) rate, depth, and fraction (CCF) between the pre-transport and intra-transport periods.
Methods: Observational study of children <18 years with either in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) or out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) who underwent transport between two care locations within the hospital for ECPR and who had CPR mechanics data available. Descriptive patient and arrest characteristics were summarized. The primary analysis compared pre- to intra-transport CC rate, depth, and fraction. A secondary analysis compared the proportion of pre- versus intra-transport 60-s epochs meeting guideline recommendations for rate (100-120/min), depth (≥4 cm for infants; ≥5 cm for children ≥1 year), and CCF (≥0.80).
Results: Seven patients (four IHCA; three witnessed OHCA) met eligibility criteria. Six (86%) patients survived the event and two (28%) survived to hospital discharge. Median transport CPR duration was 7 [IQR 5.5, 8.5] minutes. There were no differences in pre- vs. intra-transport CC rate (115 [113, 118] vs. 118 [114, 127] CCs/minute; p = 0.18), depth (3.2 [2.7, 4.4] vs. 3.6 [2.5, 4.6] cm; p = 0.50), or CCF (0.89 [0.82, 0.90] vs. 0.92 [0.79, 0.97]; p = 0.31). Equivalent proportions of 60-s CPR epochs met guideline recommendations between pre- and intra-transport (rate: 66% vs. 57% [p = 0.22]; depth: 14% vs. 19% [p = 0.39]; CCF: 80% vs. 75% [p = 0.43]).
Conclusions: Pediatric CPR quality was maintained during intra-hospital patient transport, suggesting that it is reasonable for ECPR systems to incorporate patient transport to facilitate ECMO cannulation.
Keywords: CPR quality; Cardiac arrest; Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; Pediatric; Transport.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST:
Dr. Morgan’s effort was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (K23HL148541). The authors report no other conflicts of interest related specifically to this manuscript. Unrelated disclosures include the following: Dr. Himebauch receives grant funding from his institution. Dr. Kilbaugh receives grant funding from the NIH and the Department of Defense. Dr. Berg receives grant funding from the NIH. Ms. Graham receives grant funding from the NIH. Mr. Hanna receives salary support from Zoll Medical. Dr. Wolfe receives grant funding from the NIH and received a speaking honorarium from Zoll Medical. Dr. Sutton receives grant funding from the NIH, serves on the American Heart Association (AHA) Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee, and is Vice Chair of the AHA Get with the Guidelines-Resuscitation Pediatric Task Force. Dr. Morgan serves on the AHA Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee.
Figures
References
-
- Benjamin EJ, Virani SS, Callaway CW, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics - 2018 update: A report from the American Heart Association; vol. 137 2018. - PubMed
-
- Matos RI, Watson RS, Nadkarni VM, et al. Duration of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and illness category impact survival and neurologic outcomes for in-hospital pediatric cardiac arrests. Circulation 2013;127:442–51. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
