Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 May;8(1):e001058.
doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-001058.

Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) as diagnostic criteria for diabetes: the optimal cut-off points values for the Pakistani population; a study from second National Diabetes Survey of Pakistan (NDSP) 2016-2017

Collaborators, Affiliations

Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) as diagnostic criteria for diabetes: the optimal cut-off points values for the Pakistani population; a study from second National Diabetes Survey of Pakistan (NDSP) 2016-2017

Abdul Basit et al. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020 May.

Abstract

Aim: Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) cut-off values as diagnostic tool in diabetes and prediabetes with its concordance to oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) in Pakistani population.

Methodology: Data for this substudy was obtained from second National Diabetes Survey of Pakistan (NDSP) 2016-2017. With this survey, 10 834 individuals were recruited and after excluding known subjects with diabetes, 6836 participants fulfilled inclusion criteria for this study. Demographic, anthropometric and biochemical parameters were obtained. OGTT was used as standard diagnostic tool to screen population and HbA1c for optimal cut-off values. Participants were categorized into normal glucose tolerance (NGT), newly diagnosed diabetes (NDD) and prediabetes.

Results: Out of 6836 participants, 4690 (68.6%) had NGT, 1333 (19.5%) had prediabetes and 813 (11.9%) had NDD by OGTT criteria with median (IQR) age of 40 (31-50) years. Optimal HbA1c cut-off point for identification of diabetes and prediabetes was observed as 5.7% ((AUC (95% CI)=0.776 (0.757 to 0.795), p<0.0001)) and 5.1% ((AUC (95% CI)=0.607 (0.590 to 0.624), p<0.0001)), respectively. However, out of 68.6% NGT subjects identified through OGTT, 24.1% and 9.3% participants were found to have prediabetes and NDD, respectively by using HbA1c criteria. By using both OGTT and HbA1c criteria, only 7.9% and 7.3% were observed as prediabetes and diabetes, respectively.

Conclusion: Findings from second NDSP demonstrated disagreement between findings of OGTT and HbA1c as diagnostic tool for Pakistani population. As compared with international guidelines, HbA1c threshold for prediabetes and NDD were lower in this part of world. HbA1c as diagnostic tool might require ethnic or regional-based modification in cut-off points, validated by relevant community-based epidemiological surveys.

Keywords: HbA1c; diagnosis and classification; diagnostic criteria; dysglycemia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

References

    1. Radhakrishna P, Vinod KV, Sujiv A, et al. . Comparison of Hemoglobin A1c with Fasting and 2-h Plasma Glucose Tests for Diagnosis of Diabetes and Prediabetes among High-risk South Indians. Indian J Endocrinol Metab 2018;22:50–6. 10.4103/ijem.IJEM_254_17 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yoon K-H, Lee J-H, Kim J-W, et al. . Epidemic obesity and type 2 diabetes in Asia. Lancet 2006;368:1681–8. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69703-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Basit A, Fawwad A, Qureshi H, et al. . Prevalence of diabetes, pre-diabetes and associated risk factors: second national diabetes survey of Pakistan (NDSP), 2016-2017. BMJ Open 2018;8:e020961. 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020961 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. American Diabetes Association 2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2019. Diabetes Care 2019;42:S13–28. 10.2337/dc19-S002 - DOI - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization Definition and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and intermediate hyperglycemia: report of a WHO/IDF consultation, 2006.

Publication types