Choice of statistical model in observational studies of ART
- PMID: 32424400
- PMCID: PMC7368396
- DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deaa050
Choice of statistical model in observational studies of ART
Abstract
Analyzing data on ART presents unique and sometimes complicated challenges related to choosing the unit(s) of analysis and the statistical model. In this commentary, we provide examples of how these challenges arise and guidance for overcoming them. We discuss the implications of different ways to count treatment cycles, considering the perspectives of research questions, data management and analysis and patient counseling. We present the advantages and disadvantages of different statistical models, and finally, we discuss the definition and calculation of the cumulative incidence of live birth, which is a key outcome of research on ART.
Keywords: assisted reproductive technologies; data analysis; data reporting; research methods; statistical models.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
References
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology In: 2016 Assisted Reproductive Technology National Summary Report. Atlanta (GA): US Dept of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC, USA, 2018.
-
- Cook TD. Up with odds ratios! A case for odds ratios when outcomes are common. Acad Emerg Med 2002;9:1430–1434. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical