Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Apr 30:11:797.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00797. eCollection 2020.

Gender Effects in Observation of Robotic and Humanoid Actions

Affiliations

Gender Effects in Observation of Robotic and Humanoid Actions

Miriam Abel et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Robots are gaining an increasingly important role in industrial production. Notably, a high level of acceptance is an important factor for co-working situation between human and robot. The aim of the present study was to investigate the differences in the perception of anthropomorphic and robotic movements using models consisting of a virtual robot and a digital human. Videos of each model displayed different degrees of human likeness or robot likeness in speed and trajectories of placing movements. Female and male participants were asked to rate on a Likert scale the perceived levels of human likeness or robot likeness in the two models. Overall, results suggest that males were sensitive to the differences between robotic and anthropomorphic movements, whereas females showed no difference between them. However, compared to males, female participants attributed more anthropomorphic features to robotic movements. The study is a first step toward a more comprehensive understanding of the human ability to differentiate between anthropomorphic and robotic movements and suggests a crucial role of gender in the human-robot interaction.

Keywords: anthropomorphism; digital human model; gantry robot model; gender effect; human-robot interaction; mirror neurons system; motion perception.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Experimental setting to track human placement movements (Kuz et al., 2015). (A) Initial position with the tracking markers M1, M2, M3, M4. (B) Target position.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Example for robot model for the four movements on the grid pad we recorded for the human model and the robot model.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Visual representation of the factorial design: the depicted trajectories (projections on the X, Y plane) belong to a digital human model and to a gantry robot model performing anthropomorphic and robotic movements. The unit is millimeter (mm).
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Gender x movement type interaction, including standard error bars. On the y-axis the 5-point rating scale is depicted (5 = very anthropomorphic; 1 = very robotic).

References

    1. Billings D. R., Schaefer K. E., Chen J. Y. C., Hancock P. A. (2012). “Human-robot interaction: developing trust in robots,” in Proceedings of the 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, Boston, MA, 109–110.
    1. Choi M., Kornfield R., Takayama L., Mutlu B. (2017). “Movement matters: effects of motion and mimicry on perception of similarity and closeness in robot-mediated communication,” in Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (Denver: ACM; ), 325–335.
    1. Di Pellegrino G., Fadiga L., Fogassi L., Gallese V., Rizzolatti G. (1992). Understanding motor events: a neurophysiological study. Exp. Brain Res. 91 176–180. 10.1007/bf00230027 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Duffy B. R. (2003). Anthropomorphism and The Social Robot. Spec. Issue Soc. Interact. Robots Anthropomor. Auton. Syst. 42 177–190. 10.1016/S0921-8890(02)00374-3 - DOI
    1. Fabbri-Destro M., Rizzolatti G. (2008). Mirror neurons and mirror systems in monkeys and humans. Physiology 23 171–179. 10.1152/physiol.00004.2008 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources