Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2020 Sep;49(7):101813.
doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101813. Epub 2020 May 16.

Laparoscopic surgery for benign adnexal conditions under spinal anaesthesia: Towards a multidisciplinary minimally invasive approach

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Laparoscopic surgery for benign adnexal conditions under spinal anaesthesia: Towards a multidisciplinary minimally invasive approach

Diego Raimondo et al. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2020 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic gynaecological surgery is commonly performed under general anaesthesia with endotracheal intubation. In general surgery, locoregional anaesthesia was applied to laparoscopic procedures, increasing minimally invasive surgery advantages.

Aims: To assess and compare postoperative pain after laparoscopic adnexal procedures for benign conditions under spinal anaesthesia (SA) versus general anaesthesia (GA). Furthermore, anaesthesiologic, surgical and clinical data were evaluated in both groups.

Materials and methods: This is a prospective cohort study performed in a tertiary level referral centre for minimally invasive gynaecological surgery (Gynaecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, University of Bologna). Women scheduled for adnexal laparoscopic surgery for benign conditions between February and May 2019 were assigned to receive either SA or GA with endotracheal intubation. A sample size of 13 women per group was needed to detect a 2-point difference in pain scores.

Main findings: 13 women were enrolled in the SA arm, 15 in the GA arm. In the SA cohort, the most common intraoperative adverse event was shoulder pain, reported by 3/12 women. At 1, 8, 12, 24 and 48 h after surgery pain was significantly lower in the SA arm (p < .05). Patients submitted to SA experienced no need for opioid drugs administration, unlike those receiving GA. Patients' mobilization and return of bowel function were noted significantly earlier in the SA group (p < .05).

Conclusions: SA is a feasible, safe and effective anaesthesiologic technique for laparoscopic gynaecological procedures for benign conditions, allowing a better control of postoperative pain. Women undergoing SA achieve earlier mobilization and bowel canalization. During the Covid-19 pandemics, SA could be useful in reducing the need for invasive procedures on respiratory tract.

Keywords: ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologist; BMI, body mass index; ETCO2, end-tidal CO2; GA, general anaesthesia; General anaesthesia; LRA, locoregional anaesthesia; Laparoscopy; NSAID, non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs; PONV, postoperative nausea and vomiting; Postoperative pain; Postoperative recovery; SA, spinal anaesthesia; Spinal anaesthesia; VNRS, verbal numerical rating scale.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study Flow diagram.

References

    1. Muzii L., Achilli C., Bergamini V., Candiani M., Garavaglia E., Lazzeri L. Comparison between the stripping technique and the combined excisional/ablative technique for the treatment of bilateral ovarian endometriomas: a multicentre RCT. Hum Reprod Oxf Engl. 2016;31:339–344. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev313. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Seracchioli R., Hourcabie J.A.A., Vianello F., Govoni F., Pollastri P., Venturoli S. Laparoscopic treatment of pelvic floor defects in women of reproductive age. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2004;11:332–335. doi: 10.1016/S1074-3804(05)60045-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Singh R.K., Saini A.M., Goel N., Bisht D., Seth A. Major laparoscopic surgery under regional anesthesia: a prospective feasibility study. Med J Armed Forces India. 2015;71:126–131. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2014.12.010. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bulletti C., Seracchioli R., Polli V., Albonetti A., Rossi S., Barbieri L. Financial impact in the Italian Health Service of laparoscopic versus laparotomic surgery for the treatment of ovarian cysts. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:287–290. doi: 10.1093/HUMREP/11.2.287. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Seracchioli R., Venturoli S., Colombo F.M., Bagnoli A., Vianello F., Govoni F. GnRH agonist treatment before total laparoscopic hysterectomy for large uteri. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2003;10:316–319. doi: 10.1016/S1074-3804(05)60254-X. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types