Impact of a Multidisciplinary Sepsis Initiative on Knowledge and Behavior in a Pediatric Center

Abstract

Objective: Our institution performed an educational initiative targeting previously identified barriers to pediatric sepsis recognition and treatment. We hypothesized that provider knowledge, attitude, and behavior would be improved 1 year after implementation.

Methods: This was a prospective, observational study of a multi-faceted quality initiative introduced to providers in the Emergency Department, inpatient wards, and Pediatric Intensive Care Unit of a tertiary care children's hospital. Educational platforms consisted of quarterly electronic sepsis "newsletters," brightly colored posters highlighting protocol and screening strategies displayed throughout the hospital, and low-fidelity simulation sessions (drills) led by trained staff and incorporated into daily workflows. The content was driven by feedback from a baseline needs assessment of sepsis education. One year after implementation, the needs assessment was repeated.

Results: Over 3 months, facilitators conducted 197 drills and captured a majority of nurses (89%), pediatrics residents (96%), and respiratory therapists (62%). By 6 months, 241 sessions had been completed. Approximately 55.4% of the 442 eligible staff participated in our post-intervention survey. Overall, knowledge of diagnostic criteria for pediatric sepsis and septic shock increased from pre-intervention levels (P = 0.015). Among post-implementation respondents, drill participants outperformed their colleagues (P = 0.001). A greater percentage of post-intervention respondents indicated comfort with sepsis recognition (P < 0.001), and fewer reported hesitating to bring sepsis concerns to their care team (P < 0.01).

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that a multidisciplinary curriculum balancing active education-through brief, targeted simulation-and general awareness-through electronic resources and a poster campaign-can improve sepsis-related knowledge, attitude, and behavior among pediatric practitioners.

Fig. 1.

The number of sepsis drills performed by month and hospital unit.

Fig. 2.

Overall sepsis drill participation by provider role.

Fig. 3.

The proportion of survey respondents reporting comfort with bringing sepsis and septic shock concerns to their care team and indicating any hesitation to do so.