Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar 10;5(2):e268.
doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000268. eCollection 2020 Mar-Apr.

ED RAPID: A Novel Children's Hospital Direct Admission Process Utilizing the Emergency Department

Jeffrey P Louie  1 , Ronald A Furnival  1 , Mark G Roback  1 , Abraham K Jacob  1 , Jordan Marmet  1 , Daniel Nerheim  1 , Marissa A Hendrickson  1
Affiliations

ED RAPID: A Novel Children's Hospital Direct Admission Process Utilizing the Emergency Department

Jeffrey P Louie et al. Pediatr Qual Saf. .

Abstract

Introduction: Direct hospital admission of children without evaluation in the emergency department (ED) is common, but few guidelines exist to maximize safety by assessing patient stability. This report describes a novel approach to support patient safety.

Methods: An interdisciplinary children's hospital team developed a brief ED-based evaluation process called the ED Rapid Assessment of Patients Intended for Inpatient Disposition (ED RAPID). It entails a brief evaluation of vital signs and clinical stability by the ED attending physician and nurse. Children deemed stable are admitted to inpatient wards, whereas those requiring immediate intervention undergo full ED evaluation and disposition. We assessed outcomes for all children evaluated through this process from March 2013 through February 2015.

Results: During the study period, we identified 715 patients undergoing ED RAPID evaluation. Of these, we directly admitted 691 (96.4%) to the hospital ward after ED RAPID evaluation; median ED treatment time was 4.0 minutes. We transitioned 24 (3.4%) to full ED evaluation, 14 (2.0%) because a ward bed was unavailable, and 10 (1.4%) for clinical reasons identified in the evaluation. We admitted four of the 10 stopped (40% of stops, 0.6% of total) to an intensive care unit, and 6 (60% of stops, 0.8% of total) to the hospital ward after ED care. Eight children (1.1%) admitted to the hospital ward after ED RAPID evaluation required a transfer to an intensive care unit within 12 hours.

Conclusion: The ED RAPID evaluation process for children directly admitted to the hospital was feasible and effective in this setting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
ED RAPID documentation templates. ED RAPID, emergency department Rapid Assessment of Patients Intended for Inpatient Disposition; EHR, electronic health record.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
ED RAPID process. ED RAPID, emergency department Rapid Assessment of Patients Intended for Inpatient Disposition; EHR, electronic health record; PPM, patient placement manager; ICU, intensive care unit.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
ED RAPID utilization by month. ED RAPID, emergency department Rapid Assessment of Patients Intended for Inpatient Disposition.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Powell ES, Khare RK, Courtney DM, et al. Lower mortality in sepsis patients admitted through the ED vs direct admission. Am J Emerg Med. 2012; 30:432–439 - PubMed
    1. Li J, Monuteaux MC, Bachur RG. Interfacility transfers of noncritically ill children to academic pediatric emergency departments. Pediatrics. 2012; 130:83–92 - PubMed
    1. Webber EC, Bauer BD, Marcum CK, et al. Before the flood: impact of coordination of care and direct admissions on emergency department volumes. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2018; 34:208–211 - PubMed
    1. Leyenaar JK, Shieh MS, Lagu T, et al. Direct admission to hospitals among children in the United States. JAMA Pediatr. 2015; 169:500–502 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Smith CJ, Britigan DH, Lyden E, et al. Interunit handoffs from emergency department to inpatient care: a cross-sectional survey of physicians at a university medical center. J Hosp Med. 2015; 10:711–717 - PubMed