Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jul;30(4):576-583.
doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000778.

Systemic treatment options for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: making sense of the data

Affiliations
Review

Systemic treatment options for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: making sense of the data

Catalin Baston et al. Curr Opin Urol. 2020 Jul.

Abstract

Purpose of review: Systemic treatment options for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) have recently shifted from the traditional androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) monotherapy to multidrug approaches incorporating drugs initially approved for castration-resistant state and ADT. However, clinicians have difficulties in choosing the adequate combination therapy for individualized patient care, because of the lack of consensus regarding disease risk factors, differences in study design of the major clinical trials and lack of direct comparisons between drugs. The aim of this review is to provide an update of the current treatment options for this heterogenous group of patients.

Recent findings: Current oncological guidelines strongly recommend that patients with newly diagnosed mHSPC and high-volume disease (CHAARTED criteria) should receive docetaxel and ADT, whereas those with high-risk disease (LATITUDE criteria) abiraterone and ADT. Recently, the Food and Drug Administration approved apalutamide and enzalutamide for mHSPC. Moreover, new data support the efficacy of docetaxel and abiraterone in patients with mHSPC, regardless of metastatic burden.

Summary: Today, the combination approach should be recommended for newly diagnosed mHSPC over ADT monotherapy, but treatment initiation must be personalized based on disease, drug and patient characteristics. Thanks to continuous efforts and progress in patient and disease-related outcomes, mHSPC could become a chronic disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ferlay J, Ervik M, Lam F, et al. Global cancer observatory: cancer today. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer. Available from: https://gco.iarc.fr/today, [Accessed 06 January 2020]. [Internet].
    1. Dall’Era MA, deVere-White R, Rodriguez D, et al. Changing incidence of metastatic prostate cancer by race and age. Eur Urol Focus 2019; 5:1014–1021.
    1. Dalela D, Sun M, Diaz M, et al. Contemporary trends in the incidence of metastatic prostate cancer among US men: results from nationwide analyses. Eur Urol Focus 2019; 5:77–80.
    1. Kelly SP, Anderson WF, Rosenberg PS, Cook MB. Past, current, and future incidence rates and burden of metastatic prostate cancer in the United States. Eur Urol Focus 2018; 4:121–127.
    1. James ND, Spears MR, Clarke NW, et al. Survival with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer in the ‘docetaxel era’: data from 917 patients in the control arm of the STAMPEDE trial (MRC PR08, CRUK/06/019). Eur Urol 2015; 67:1028–1038.