Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2021 Jan;36(1):105-111.
doi: 10.1111/jgh.15107. Epub 2020 Jun 8.

A propensity score weighted comparison of vedolizumab and adalimumab in Crohn's disease

Affiliations
Comparative Study

A propensity score weighted comparison of vedolizumab and adalimumab in Crohn's disease

Fabio Salvatore Macaluso et al. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Jan.

Abstract

Background and aim: There are no head-to-head randomized controlled trials between biologics in Crohn's disease (CD). We aimed to perform a multicenter, real-life comparison of the effectiveness of vedolizumab (VDZ) and adalimumab (ADA) in CD.

Methods: Data of consecutive patients with CD treated with VDZ and ADA from January 2016 to April 2019 were extracted from the cohort of the Sicilian Network for Inflammatory Bowel Disease. The effectiveness was evaluated at 12, 52 weeks, and as failure-free survival at the end of follow up. Propensity score analysis was performed using the inverse probability of treatment weighting method.

Results: Five hundred eighty-five treatments (VDZ: n = 277; ADA: n = 308) were included (median follow-up: 56.0 weeks). After 12 weeks, a clinical response was achieved in 64.3% patients treated with VDZ and in 83.1% patients treated with ADA (odds ratio [OR] 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.38-1.10, P = 0.107), while at 52 weeks, a clinical response was observed in 54.0% patients treated with VDZ and in 69.1% patients treated with ADA (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.45-1.31, P = 0.336). Cox survival analysis weighted for propensity score showed no significant difference in the probability of failure-free survival between the two drugs (hazard ratio = 1.20, 95% CI 0.83-1.74, P = 0.340). Post-treatment endoscopic response and mucosal healing rates were similar between the two groups (endoscopic response: 35.3% for VDZ and 25.5% for ADA, P = 0.15; mucosal healing: 31.8% for VDZ and 33.8% for ADA, P = 0.85).

Conclusions: In the first study comparing VDZ and ADA in CD via propensity score analysis, the drugs showed comparable effectiveness and a similar safety profile.

Keywords: biologics; effectiveness; propensity score; safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Abraham C, Cho JH. Inflammatory bowel disease. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 2066-2078.
    1. Hoivik ML, Moum B, Solberg IC et al. Work disability in inflammatory bowel disease patients 10 years after disease onset: results from the IBSEN study. Gut 2013; 62: 368-375.
    1. Hold GL, Smith M, Grange C et al. Role of the gut microbiota in inflammatory bowel disease pathogenesis: what have we learnt in the past 10 years? World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20: 1192-1210.
    1. Armuzzi A, Gionchetti P, Daperno M et al. GIVI (Gruppo Italiano su Vedolizumab nelle IBD) Group. Expert consensus paper on the use of vedolizumab for the management of patients with moderate-to.severe inflammatory bowel disease. Dig Liver Dis 2016; 48: 360-370.
    1. Macaluso FS, Orlando A, Cottone M. Anti-interleukin-12 and anti-interleukin-23 agents in Crohn's disease. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2019; 19: 89-98.