Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep;28(9):478-484.
doi: 10.1007/s12471-020-01422-0.

Improvement in quality of life and angina pectoris: 1-year follow-up of patients with refractory angina pectoris and spinal cord stimulation

F E Vervaat  1 , A van der Gaag  2 , H van Suijlekom  2 , C J Botman  3 , K Teeuwen  3 , I Wijnbergen  3
Affiliations

Improvement in quality of life and angina pectoris: 1-year follow-up of patients with refractory angina pectoris and spinal cord stimulation

F E Vervaat et al. Neth Heart J. 2020 Sep.

Abstract

Aims: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a treatment for patients with refractory angina pectoris (RAP) who remain symptomatic despite optimal medical therapy and without revascularisation options. Previous studies have shown that SCS improves the quality of life in this patient group and reduces the severity of the angina pectoris. The aim of this prospective, single-arm observational study is to show this effect in a single-centre cohort using a multidisciplinary team approach to the selection process, with a follow-up period of 1 year.

Methods and results: Between July 2010 and March 2017, 87 patients with RAP referred to our centre received SCS. The Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) and RAND 36-Item Health Survey (RAND-36) were completed at baseline, prior to implantation, and 1 year post-implantation. After 1 year of follow-up there was a statistically significant decrease in the frequency of angina pectoris attacks from more than 4 times a day to 1-2 times a week (p < 0.001). The SAQ showed statistically significant improvement in four of the five dimensions: physical limitation (p < 0.001), angina frequency (p < 0.001), angina stability (p < 0.001) and quality of life (p < 0.001). The RAND-36 showed statistically significant improvement in all nine dimensions: physical functioning (p = 0.001), role/physical (p < 0.001), social functioning (p = 0.03), role/emotional (p < 0.05), bodily pain (p < 0.001), general health (p < 0.001), vitality (p < 0.001), mental health (p = 0.02) and health change (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: This study showed a significant improvement in quality of life and reduction of angina pectoris severity after 1 year of follow-up in patients treated with SCS for RAP.

Keywords: Refractory angina pectoris; Spinal cord stimulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

F.E. Vervaat, A. van der Gaag, H. van Suijlekom, C.J. Botman, K. Teeuwen and I. Wijnbergen declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Selection process. (CCS Canadian Cardiovascular Society, CABG coronary artery bypass graft, PCI percutaneous coronary intervention, TENS transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, SCS spinal cord stimulation. aReasons for TENS instead of SCS: patient request (n = 4), comorbidities (n = 5), implantation of SCS device technically unsuccessful (n = 2). bThis group of ten patients includes one patient who did not perform a treadmill stress test due to a lower leg amputation but received TENS during 1 month and continued with this treatment option)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Results of Seattle Angina Questionnaire at baseline versus 1 year. (**p < 0.001)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
a, b Results of RAND 36-Item Health Survey at baseline versus 1 year. (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.001)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
One-year results of frequency of angina pectoris (a) and frequency of use of short-acting nitrates (b)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Mannheimer C, Camici P, Chester MR, et al. The problem of chronic refractory angina: report from the ESC Joint Study Group on the Treatment of Refractory Angina. Eur Heart J. 2002;23:355–370. doi: 10.1053/euhj.2001.2706. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Latif OA, Nedeukovic SS, Stevenson LW. Spinal cord stimulation for chronic intractable angina pectoris: a unified theory on its mechanism. Clin Cardiol. 2001;24:533–541. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960240803. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Eldabe S, Thomson S, Duarte R, et al. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation for refractory angina (RASCAL study): a pilot randomized controlled trial. Neuromodulation. 2016;19:60–70. doi: 10.1111/ner.12349. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. De Jongste MJ, Haaksma J, Hautvast RW, et al. Effects of spinal cord stimulation on myocardial ischemia during daily life in patients with severe coronary artery disease. A prospective ambulatory electrocardiographic study. Br Heart J. 1994;71:413–418. doi: 10.1136/hrt.71.5.413. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hautvast RW, Blanksma PK, DeJongste MJ, et al. Effect of spinal cord stimulation on myocardial blood flow assessed by positron emission tomography in patients with refractory angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol. 1996;77:462–467. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9149(97)89338-1. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources