Validity and accuracy of body fat prediction equations using anthropometrics measurements in adolescents
- PMID: 32430885
- DOI: 10.1007/s40519-020-00918-3
Validity and accuracy of body fat prediction equations using anthropometrics measurements in adolescents
Abstract
Background: The pediatric relative fat mass (RFM) has been recently presented and validated as an index for estimating percentage body fat (%BF) in North American children and adolescents. Similar to body mass index (BMI) and tri-ponderal mass index (TMI), RFM uses anthropometric measures (i.e., weight, height and waist circumference) to estimate body composition. The primary purpose of this study was to validate the newly developed RFM equation for %BF prediction in Southern Brazilian adolescents; as secondary objective, we compared %BF estimation from BMI- and TMI-derived equations.
Methods: A total of 631 individuals (434 boys) aged 11 to 18 were analyzed. Bland-Altman analyses were used to determine concordance between predicted equations and %BF measured by DXA; results are presented using mean difference (i.e., bias) and standard deviation. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for %BF percentile classifications.
Results: RFM underestimated %BF in 65.2% of boys (- 4.3 ± 2.8%) and 84.8% of girls (- 5.3 ± 2.7%). In contrast, TMI overestimated %BF in 62.9% of boys (4.0 ± 2.9%) and 56.3% (3.5 ± 3.0%) of girls. The performance of BMI showed mixed results; %BF was overestimated in 68.4% of boys (5.0 ± 4.0%) and underestimated in 67.5% of girls (- 3.9 ± 2.6%), all p < 0.001. Although, RFM had the highest specificity for %BF percentile classifications, sensitivity was low and inferior to BMI and TMI.
Conclusion: TMI was superior to RFM and BMI in predicting %BF in Southern Brazilian adolescents. Using RFM, BMI or TMI equations for %BF prediction without a population-specific correction factor may lead to incorrect interpretations. We suggest that correction factors should be investigated to improve the accuracy of these surrogate indices for body composition assessment.
Level of evidence: Level V, cross sectional descriptive study.
Keywords: Adolescents; Body composition; Body fat; Obesity; Public health.
References
-
- Bentham J, Di Cesare M, Bilano V, Bixby H, Zhou B, Stevens GA et al (2017) Worldwide trends in body-mass index, underweight, overweight, and obesity from 1975 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 2416 population-based measurement studies in 128·9 million children, adolescents, and adults. Lancet 390:2627–2642. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32129-3 - DOI
-
- Sharma V, Coleman S, Nixon J, Sharples L, Hamilton-Shield J, Rutter H et al (2019) A systematic review and meta-analysis estimating the population prevalence of comorbidities in children and adolescents aged 5 to 18 years. Obes Rev 20:1341–1349. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12904 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Freedman DS, Khan LK, Serdula MK, Dietz WH, Srinivasan SR, Berenson GS (2005) The relation of childhood BMI to adult adiposity: the Bogalusa heart study. Pediatrics 115:22–27. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2004-0220 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Vanderwall C, Randall Clark R, Eickhoff J, Carrel AL (2017) BMI is a poor predictor of adiposity in young overweight and obese children. BMC Pediatr 17:4–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-017-0891-z - DOI
-
- Peterson CM, Su H, Thomas DM, Heo M, Golnabi AH, Pietrobelli A et al (2017) Tri-ponderal mass index vs body mass index in estimating body fat during adolescence. JAMA Pediatr 171:629–636. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.0460 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources