Dissociation between Cervical Mucus and Urinary Hormones during the Postpartum Return of Fertility in Breastfeeding Women
- PMID: 32431376
- PMCID: PMC6322125
- DOI: 10.1177/0024363918809698
Dissociation between Cervical Mucus and Urinary Hormones during the Postpartum Return of Fertility in Breastfeeding Women
Abstract
Identifying the return of fertility with cervical mucus observations is challenging during the postpartum period. Use of urinary measurements of estrogen and progesterone can assist in understanding the return to fertility during this period. The purposes of this study were to describe the postpartum return of fertility by an analysis of total estrogen (TE) and pregnanediol glucuronide (PDG) profiles and to correlate these profiles with cervical mucus observations. Twenty-six participants collected urine samples during the postpartum period and recorded mucus scores. TE and PDG hormones were analyzed and compared with mucus scores. During amenorrhea, mucus reflected TE changes in only 35 percent of women; after amenorrhea, typical mucus patterns were seen in 33 percent of cycles. We concluded that postpartum mucus and hormone profiles are significantly dissociated but that monitoring urinary hormones may assist in identifying the return of fertility. We also identified different hormonal patterns in the return to fertility. The postpartum period is a challenging time for identifying the return of fertility. The purposes of this study were to describe the hormonal patterns during the return of fertility and to correlate these patterns with cervical mucus observations. Twenty-six postpartum women collected urine samples and recorded mucus scores. Urinary estrogen and progesterone hormones were analyzed and compared with mucus scores. Before the return of menses, mucus reflected hormonal changes in only 35 percent women and after first menses in 33 percent of cycles. We found that hormone profiles do not correlate well with mucus observations during the postpartum return of fertility.
Keywords: Breastfeeding; Estrone-3-glucuronide; Natural family planning; Postpartum; Pregnanediol.
© Catholic Medical Association 2018.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Using Quantitative Hormone Monitoring to Identify the Postpartum Return of Fertility.Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Nov 15;59(11):2008. doi: 10.3390/medicina59112008. Medicina (Kaunas). 2023. PMID: 38004057 Free PMC article.
-
Late infertile days in early postpartum cycles.Clin Reprod Fertil. 1985 Mar;3(1):73-80. Clin Reprod Fertil. 1985. PMID: 4038908
-
Breast-feeding and return to fertility: clinical evidence from Pakistan, Philippines and Thailand.Asia Pac Popul J. 1990 Mar;5(1):45-56. Asia Pac Popul J. 1990. PMID: 12283348
-
Natural family planning indicators of ovulation.Clin Reprod Fertil. 1987 Jun;5(3):91-117. Clin Reprod Fertil. 1987. PMID: 3322540 Review.
-
Natural regulation of fertility.Br Med Bull. 1993 Jan;49(1):182-99. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a072597. Br Med Bull. 1993. PMID: 8324608 Review.
Cited by
-
Effectiveness of a Postpartum Breastfeeding Protocol for Avoiding Pregnancy.Linacre Q. 2023 May;90(2):182-193. doi: 10.1177/00243639231167235. Epub 2023 May 9. Linacre Q. 2023. PMID: 37325426 Free PMC article.
-
Establishing a Gold Standard for Quantitative Menstrual Cycle Monitoring.Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Aug 23;59(9):1513. doi: 10.3390/medicina59091513. Medicina (Kaunas). 2023. PMID: 37763632 Free PMC article.
-
Abrupt perturbation and delayed recovery of the vaginal ecosystem following childbirth.Nat Commun. 2023 Jul 12;14(1):4141. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-39849-9. Nat Commun. 2023. PMID: 37438386 Free PMC article.
-
Re-embarking in ART while still breastfeeding: an unresolved question.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025 Feb;311(2):555-565. doi: 10.1007/s00404-025-07933-8. Epub 2025 Jan 20. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025. PMID: 39828777 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The State of the Science of Natural Family Planning: A Report from NFP Scientists' Meeting Held in Orlando, FL, September 4, 2024.Linacre Q. 2025 Jul 8:00243639251347842. doi: 10.1177/00243639251347842. Online ahead of print. Linacre Q. 2025. PMID: 40641837 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine Protocol Committee. 2006. ABM clinical protocol# 13: contraception during breastfeeding. Breastfeeding Medicine 1(1): 43–51. - PubMed
-
- Arevalo M., Jennings V., Sinai I. 2003. “Application of Simple Fertility Awareness-based Methods of Family Planning to Breastfeeding Women.” Fertility and Sterility 80:1241–48. - PubMed
-
- Bigelow J. L., Dunson D. B., Stanford J. B., Ecochard R., Gnoth C., Colombo B. 2004. “Mucus Observations in the Fertile Window: A Better Predictor of Conception than Timing of Intercourse.” Human Reproduction 19:889–92. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh173. - PubMed
-
- Blackwell L. F., Brown J. B., Vigil P., Gross B., Sufi S., d’Arcangues C. 2003. “Hormonal Monitoring of Ovarian Activity Using the Ovarian Monitor, Part I. Validation of Home and Laboratory Results Obtained During Ovulatory Cycles by Comparison with Radioimmunoassay.” Steroids, 68, no. 5: 465–76. - PubMed
-
- Blackwell L. F., Vigil P., Gross B., d’Arcangues C., Cooke D. G., Brown J. B. 2011. “Monitoring of Ovarian Activity by Measurement of Urinary Excretion Rates of Estrone Glucuronide and Pregnanediol Glucuronide Using the Ovarian Monitor, Part II: Reliability of Home Testing.” Human Reproduction 27: 550–557. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der409. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources