Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 May 5:11:672.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00672. eCollection 2020.

Problematic Mobile Phone and Smartphone Use Scales: A Systematic Review

Bethany Harris  1 , Timothy Regan  1 , Jordan Schueler  1 , Sherecce A Fields  2
Affiliations
Review

Problematic Mobile Phone and Smartphone Use Scales: A Systematic Review

Bethany Harris et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

The popularity of smartphones is undeniable in nearly all facets of society. Despite the many benefits attributed to the technology, concern has grown over the potential for excessive smartphone use to become problematic in nature. Due to the growing concerns surrounding the recognized and unrecognized implications of smartphone use, great efforts have been made through research to evaluate, label and identify problematic smartphone use mostly through the development and administration of scales assessing the behavior. This study examines 78 existing validated scales that have been developed over the past 13 years to measure, identify or characterize excessive or problematic smartphone use by evaluating their theoretical foundations and their psychometric properties. Our review determined that, despite an abundance of self-report scales examining the construct, many published scales lack sufficient internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Additionally, there is a lack of research supporting the theoretical foundation of many of the scales evaluated. Future research is needed to better characterize problematic smartphone use so that assessment tools can be more efficiently developed to evaluate the behavior in order to avoid the excessive publication of seemingly redundant assessment tools.

Keywords: addiction; assessment; mobile phone; problematic use; smartphone.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Study flow diagram showing review process on measures of problematic smartphone use.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Al-Barashdi H., Bouazza A., Al Zubaidi A. (2014). Psychometric properties of smartphone addiction questionnaire (SPAQ) among sultan qaboos university undergraduate students. J. Educ. Psychol. Stud. 8 637–644. 10.12816/0014333 - DOI
    1. Aljomaa S., Al Qudah M., Albursan I., Bakhiet S., Abduljabbar A. (2016). Smartphone addiction among university students in the light of some variables. Comput. Hum. Behav. 61 155–164. 10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.041 - DOI
    1. Alosaimi F. D., Alyahya H., Alshahwan H., Al Mahyijari N., Shaik S. A. (2016). Smartphone addiction among university students in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med. J. 37 675–683. 10.15537/smj.2016.6.14430 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. American Psychiatric Association (1995). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Of Mental Disorders: DSM-IV. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
    1. American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Of Mental Disorders: DSM-IV-TR. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.