Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Aug 1:222:112930.
doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2020.112930. Epub 2020 May 11.

Ethical Considerations for Food and Beverage Warnings

Affiliations

Ethical Considerations for Food and Beverage Warnings

Anna H Grummon et al. Physiol Behav. .

Abstract

Several countries have implemented warnings on unhealthy foods and beverages, with similar policies under consideration in the U.S. and around the world. Research demonstrating food warnings' effectiveness is emerging, but limited scholarship has evaluated the ethics of food warning policies. Using a public health ethics framework for evaluating obesity prevention policies, we assessed the ethical strengths and weaknesses of food warnings along multiple dimensions: 1) Health behaviors and physical health, 2) Psychosocial well-being, 3) Social and cultural values, 4) Informed choice, 5) Equality, 6) Attributions of responsibility, 7) Liberty, and 8) Privacy. Our analysis identifies both ethical strengths and weaknesses of food warnings, including that: 1) warnings are likely to generate important benefits including increased consumer understanding and informed choice, healthier purchases, and potential reductions in obesity prevalence; 2) warnings evoke negative emotional reactions, but these reactions are an important mechanism through which food warnings encourage healthier behaviors and promote informed choice; 3) warnings appear unlikely to have ethically unacceptable effects on social and cultural values, attributions of responsibility, liberty, or privacy. Current research suggests we continue to pursue food warnings as a policy option for improving public health while simultaneously conducting additional research on the ethics of these policies. Future research is especially needed to clarify warnings' effects on stigma and to characterize the balance and distribution of costs of and benefits from implementing warning policies.

Keywords: Food and beverage warnings; ethical considerations; ethics; health warnings; obesity prevention; warning labels.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Mock-up of the sugar-sweetened beverage warning proposed by California in 2019.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
One of the four health warnings implemented in Chile in 2016. The warning text translates to “HIGH IN SODIUM.”
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Summary of evidence that food warnings may be ethically defensible.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Imamura F, Micha R, Khatibzadeh S, et al. Dietary quality among men and women in 187 countries in 1990 and 2010: a systematic assessment. The Lancet Global Health. 2015;3(3):e132–e142. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70381-X - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Swinburn B, Sacks G, Ravussin E. Increased food energy supply is more than sufficient to explain the US epidemic of obesity. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;90(6):1453–1456. doi:10.3945/ajcn.2009.28595 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bleich SN, Cutler D, Murray C, Adams A. Why is the developed world obese? Annu Rev Public Health. 2008;29:273–295. - PubMed
    1. Danaei G, Ding EL, Mozaffarian D, et al. The preventable causes of death in the United States: Comparative risk assessment of dietary, lifestyle, and metabolic risk factors. PLoS Med. 2009;6(4):e1000058. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000058 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Micha R, Peñalvo JL, Cudhea F, Imamura F, Rehm CD, Mozaffarian D. Association between dietary factors and mortality from heart disease, stroke, and type 2 diabetes in the United States. Jama. 2017;317(9):912–924. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types