Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020;28(5):1345-1367.
doi: 10.1007/s10924-020-01722-x. Epub 2020 Mar 31.

Trends in 3D Printing Processes for Biomedical Field: Opportunities and Challenges

Affiliations
Review

Trends in 3D Printing Processes for Biomedical Field: Opportunities and Challenges

Alina Ghilan et al. J Polym Environ. 2020.

Abstract

Keywords: Additive manufacturing; Bioinks; Biomaterials; Bioprinting; Machine learning; Medicine; Polymer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Schematic illustration showing the AM process flow and evolution over the years
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Schematic illustration showing the main differences between 3D (bio)printing and 4D (bio)printing
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
3D bioplotting of alginate hydrogels: a cultivated Schwann cells mixed with alginate hydrogel and then bioplotted, b cell-incorporated alginate scaffold and staining result showing one strand, and c poor printability of 0.5% alginate printed with a 100-µm needle and staining result of cell-incorporated gel [50]
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Stent configurations: a Stent cell geometries employed; b Stent material/layers used [88]
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
3D printed objects fabricated using different AM techniques: a PCL/PEG polyblend scaffold for bone regeneration; [94] b PCL, PVAc and hydroxyapatite composite porous scaffolds employing bone regeneration; [96] c 3D printed nose based on a alginate–chitosan complex hydrogel; [59] d native anatomic and axisymmetric aortic valve geometries printed with PEG-diacrylate hydrogels; [145] e various 3D anatomical geometries based on PEG–alginate–nanoclay hydrogels; [146] f PEG hydrogel microspheres as bilding blocks for 3D printed scaffolds; [115] g vascular structures based on alginate; [147] h 3D-printed artificial trachea scaffolds based on PCL; [148] i 3D printed anterior cruciate ligament screw from PLA-magnesium-α-tocopherol; [149] j 3D scanned models of wrist splints based on PLA; [150]. Reproduced with permission
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Dual-shape change tubes. a Schematic of the basic anatomy of the coral polyp; the image was created based on encyclopedic depictions of the polyp.50 b, c CAD model and image of a 3D printed and photocured tube with cylindrical base and three fingers. dg Optical snapshots of shape change of the tube at different temperatures. The tube was suspended over a part placed in a tank. When water was added to the tank, the tube shows uniaxial elongation and gripping of the part. Upon heating to 50 °C, the tube shortened and the fingers opened to release the part back to the bottom of the tank. Scale bars are 1 cm [159]
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Examples of the fabricated self-folding tubes (from right to left): schematic illustrations and representative microscope images of single tubes with/without printed cells formed through the described 4D biofabrication process; photograph of a glass vial containing a large number of self-folded tubes, indicating on the possibility of their large-scale production [7]
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
The core concepts of AM and ML (adapted from Felix W. Baumann et al. [211])
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
The relationship between ML and AM processes. (adapted from Felix W. Baumann et al. [211])

References

    1. Douroumis D. 3D printing of pharmaceutical and medical applications: a new era. Pharm Res. 2019;36(3):41–42. - PubMed
    1. Jamróz W, Szafraniec J, Kurek M, Jachowicz R. 3D printing in pharmaceutical and medical applications: recent achievements and challenges. Pharm Res. 2018;35(9):1–22. - PMC - PubMed
    1. De Mori A, Peña Fernández M, Blunn G, Tozzi G, Roldo M. 3D printing and electrospinning of composite hydrogels for cartilage and bone tissue engineering. Polymers. 2018;10(3):1–26. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gopinathan J, Noh I. Recent trends in bioinks for 3D printing. Biomater Res. 2018;22(1):1–15. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Albanna M, Binder K, Murphy S, Kim J, Qasem S, Zhao W. In situ bioprinting of autologous skin cells accelerates wound healing of extensive excisional full-thickness wounds. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):1–15. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources