Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of STEMI Patients With Cardiogenic Shock and Cardiac Arrest
- PMID: 32438992
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.04.004
Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of STEMI Patients With Cardiogenic Shock and Cardiac Arrest
Abstract
Objectives: This study sought to compare the clinical characteristics and long-term outcomes of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) with and without cardiogenic shock (CS) or cardiac arrest (CA) before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Background: Patients with STEMI complicated by CS or CA are underrepresented in STEMI registries.
Methods: Consecutive patients with STEMI or new left bundle branch block within 24 h of symptom onset were included in a regional STEMI program comprising a PCI center (Minneapolis Heart Institute at Abbott Northwestern Hospital), 11 hospitals <60 miles from PCI center (zone 1), and 19 hospitals 60 to 210 miles from PCI center (zone 2). No patients were excluded. Patients were stratified based on the presence (+) or absence (-) of CS or CA before PCI. Patients with CA were further classified based on initial rhythm. Primary outcomes were in-hospital and 5-year mortality.
Results: Between March 2003 and December 2014, 4,511 STEMI patients were included in the regional program, including 398 (9%) with CS and 499 (11%) with CA. Hospital mortality was: CS+ and CA+, 44%; CS+ and CA-, 23%; CS- and CA+, 19%; and CS- and CA-, 2% (p < 0.001). The 5-year survival probability for CS+ and CA+ patients was 0.69 (95% confidence interval: 0.61 to 0.76) and 0.89 (95% confidence interval: 0.84 to 0.93), respectively (p < 0.01). Compared with patients with shockable rhythms, CA patients with nonshockable rhythms had significantly lower odds of survival at hospital discharge and at 5 years (both p < 0.001).
Conclusions: The combination of CS and CA significantly increases short-term mortality in patients with STEMI. After 5 years of follow-up, CS patients remained at high risk of fatal events, whereas the prognosis of CA patients was determined by initial rhythm at presentation.
Keywords: ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; cardiac arrest; cardiogenic shock.
Copyright © 2020 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Surviving the "After-Shock".JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 May 25;13(10):1220-1222. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.04.014. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020. PMID: 32438993 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Management and predictors of outcome in unselected patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results from the Bremen STEMI Registry.Clin Res Cardiol. 2018 May;107(5):371-379. doi: 10.1007/s00392-017-1192-0. Epub 2017 Dec 11. Clin Res Cardiol. 2018. PMID: 29230546
-
Primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction, resuscitated cardiac arrest, and cardiogenic shock: the role of primary multivessel revascularization.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Feb;6(2):115-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.10.006. Epub 2013 Jan 23. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013. PMID: 23352816
-
Electrocardiographic patterns and clinical outcomes of acute coronary syndrome cardiogenic shock in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention - A propensity score analysis.Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2024 Aug;65:58-64. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2024.02.022. Epub 2024 Mar 4. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2024. PMID: 38448259
-
Culprit Vessel-Only Versus Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Complicating ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Collaborative Meta-Analysis.Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Nov;10(11):e005582. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005582. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017. PMID: 29146672 Review.
-
Prevention of Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction.Circulation. 2019 Jan 2;139(1):137-139. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.036536. Circulation. 2019. PMID: 30586685 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Comparative predictive value of APACHE-II, SAPS-II and GRACE scores for mortality in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients: Evidence from Indonesia intensive cardiovascular care unit registry.Narra J. 2025 Apr;5(1):e1911. doi: 10.52225/narra.v5i1.1911. Epub 2025 Feb 20. Narra J. 2025. PMID: 40352241 Free PMC article.
-
Concomitant Sepsis Diagnoses in Acute Myocardial Infarction-Cardiogenic Shock: 15-Year National Temporal Trends, Management, and Outcomes.Crit Care Explor. 2022 Feb 4;4(2):e0637. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000637. eCollection 2022 Feb. Crit Care Explor. 2022. PMID: 35141527 Free PMC article.
-
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention After Return of Spontaneous Circulation Reduces the In-Hospital Mortality in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiac Arrest.Int J Gen Med. 2021 Oct 28;14:7361-7369. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S326737. eCollection 2021. Int J Gen Med. 2021. PMID: 34737630 Free PMC article.
-
Management of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in High-Risk Settings.Int J Angiol. 2021 Mar;30(1):53-66. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1723941. Epub 2021 Feb 12. Int J Angiol. 2021. PMID: 34025096 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Systemic Inflammation Index Predicts Poor Clinical Prognosis in Patients with Initially Diagnosed Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Primary Coronary Angiography.J Inflamm Res. 2023 Nov 13;16:5205-5219. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S435398. eCollection 2023. J Inflamm Res. 2023. PMID: 38026253 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous