Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jan 6;43(1):137-156.
doi: 10.1007/s40614-019-00240-z. eCollection 2020 Mar.

On Power and Freedom: Extending the Definition of Coercion

Sonia M Goltz  1
Affiliations

On Power and Freedom: Extending the Definition of Coercion

Sonia M Goltz. Perspect Behav Sci. .

Abstract

Defining coercion has been a topic of interest to behavior analysts from time to time. Given the more and more subtle influence strategies that technology has enabled, it is time to revisit these definitions. This article examines the definitions of power, freedom, and coercion in behavior analysis, comparing them to philosophical views of power, freedom, and coercion. Two extensions to the definition of coercion are suggested. First, definitions could include as coercive the removal of resources needed to generate the responses required to obtain reinforcement, or in some cases, the neglect to provide these resources. Second, choice architecture systems that are not transparent to the individuals being influenced and for which their consent has not been provided could be considered to be coercive. Implications of these extensions are discussed, including the need to examine behavior management methods for interactions considered to be coercive under the new definitions.

Keywords: Choice architecture; Coercion; Freedom; Power.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of InterestThe Author declares that she has no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Al-Jenaibi B. The scope and impact of workplace diversity in the United Arab Emirates: A preliminary study. Geografia Online: Malaysia Journal of Society & Space. 2012;8(1):1–14.
    1. Anderson S. The enforcement approach to coercion. Journal of Ethics & Social Philosophy. 2010;5:1–31. doi: 10.26556/jesp.v5i1.47. - DOI
    1. Anderson E. The problem of equality from a political economy perspective. In: Sobel D, Vallentyne P, Wall S, editors. Oxford studies in political philosophy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2017. pp. 36–57.
    1. Andreou, A., Venkatadri, G., Goga, O., Gummadi, K. P., Loiseau, P., & Mislove, A. (2018, February). Investigating ad transparency mechanisms in social media: A case study of Facebook’s explanations. Paper presented at the Network and Distributed Systems Security (NDSS) Symposium, San Diego, CA. 10.14722/ndss.2018.23191
    1. Archard D. Paternalism defined. Analysis. 1990;50:36–42. doi: 10.2307/3328207. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources