Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2020 Oct;59(7):3325-3338.
doi: 10.1007/s00394-020-02282-5. Epub 2020 May 21.

Prebiotic effect of inulin-type fructans on faecal microbiota and short-chain fatty acids in type 2 diabetes: a randomised controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Prebiotic effect of inulin-type fructans on faecal microbiota and short-chain fatty acids in type 2 diabetes: a randomised controlled trial

Eline Birkeland et al. Eur J Nutr. 2020 Oct.

Erratum in

Abstract

Purpose: Compared to a healthy population, the gut microbiota in type 2 diabetes presents with several unfavourable features that may impair glucose regulation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prebiotic effect of inulin-type fructans on the faecal microbiota and short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Methods: The study was a placebo controlled crossover study, where 25 patients (15 men) aged 41-71 years consumed 16 g of inulin-type fructans (a mixture of oligofructose and inulin) and 16-g placebo (maltodextrin) for 6 weeks in randomised order. A 4-week washout separated the 6 weeks treatments. The faecal microbiota was analysed by high-throughput 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing and SCFA in faeces were analysed using vacuum distillation followed by gas chromatography.

Results: Treatment with inulin-type fructans induced moderate changes in the faecal microbiota composition (1.5%, p = 0.045). A bifidogenic effect was most prominent, with highest positive effect on operational taxonomic units (OTUs) of Bifidobacterium adolescentis, followed by OTUs of Bacteroides. Significantly higher faecal concentrations of total SCFA, acetic acid and propionic acid were detected after prebiotic consumption compared to placebo. The prebiotic fibre had no effects on the concentration of butyric acid or on the overall microbial diversity.

Conclusion: Six weeks supplementation with inulin-type fructans had a significant bifidogenic effect and induced increased concentrations of faecal SCFA, without changing faecal microbial diversity. Our findings suggest a moderate potential of inulin-type fructans to improve gut microbiota composition and to increase microbial fermentation in type 2 diabetes.

Trial registration: The trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02569684).

Keywords: 16S rRNA sequencing; Faecal bacteria; Prebiotics; SCFA; Type 2 diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Relative abundance (%) of the dominating phyla in faeces of the participants at baseline
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
OTUs affected by the prebiotic intervention for 6 weeks sorted by effect size. Effect size is the differences between prebiotic intervention period compared to placebo period /baseline (log2). Dominating OTUs (> 0.1%) are indicated in bold, and the relative average abundance of the OTUs is included at the right. Brackets indicate candidate taxonomy. Bars are coloured according to representative phylum
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Microbial diversity shown as number of observed OTUs between prebiotics and placebo at baseline (0w) and after treatment period of 6 weeks (6w)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Heatmap of OTUs related to SCFA by PLS regression. Only OTUs affected by the prebiotic intervention are presented and sorted by their effect sizes (as in Fig. 2). Correlation is estimated with Spearman’s rho coefficient, where red is a positive and blue is a negative relation. Asterisk indicates significant relationship (VIP > 1.2). Dominating OTUs (> 0.1%) are indicated in bold

References

    1. American Diabetes Association 5. Lifestyle management: standards of medical care in diabetes-2019. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(Suppl 1):S46–S60. doi: 10.2337/dc19-S005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Silva FM, Kramer CK, de Almeida JC, Steemburgo T, Gross JL, Azevedo MJ. Fiber intake and glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Nutr Rev. 2013;71(12):790–801. doi: 10.1111/nure.12076. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Reynolds A, Mann J, Cummings J, Winter N, Mete E, Te Morenga L. Carbohydrate quality and human health: a series of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Lancet. 2019;393(10170):434–445. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31809-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gibson GR, Hutkins R, Sanders ME, Prescott SL, Reimer RA, Salminen SJ, Scott K, Stanton C, Swanson KS, Cani PD, Verbeke K, Reid G. Expert consensus document: The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) consensus statement on the definition and scope of prebiotics. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;14(8):491–502. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2017.75. - DOI - PubMed
    1. O'Callaghan A, van Sinderen D. Bifidobacteria and their role as members of the human gut microbiota. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:925. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00925. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data