Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun;85(6):1063-1078.
doi: 10.1007/s00280-020-04079-z. Epub 2020 May 21.

Evaluation of NUC-1031: a first-in-class ProTide in biliary tract cancer

Affiliations

Evaluation of NUC-1031: a first-in-class ProTide in biliary tract cancer

Mansi Arora et al. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2020 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: NUC1031 is a first-in-class ProTide, that is a gemcitabine pro-drug designed to overcome putative mechanisms of resistance, including decreased expression of hENT/hCNT transporters, absence of activating enzymes such as deoxycytidine kinase (dCK) and presence of degrading enzymes such as cytidine deaminase (CDA). We undertook comprehensive pre-clinical evaluation of NUC1031 in biliary tract cancer (BTC) models, given that gemcitabine/cisplatin is a standard first-line therapy in advanced BTC.

Methods: Here, we compared the in vitro activity of NUC1031 in comparison to gemcitabine, validate putative mechanism(s) of action, assessed potential biomarkers of sensitivity or resistance, and performed combination studies with cisplatin. We also evaluated the in vivo efficacy of NUC1031 and gemcitabine using a CDA-high cholangiocarcinoma patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model.

Results: In a panel of BTC cell lines (N = 10), NUC1031 had less potency than gemcitabine in multiple cellular assays. NUC1031 did not demonstrate evidence of greater synergy over gemcitabine in combination with cisplatin. Surprisingly, efficacy of both gemcitabine and NUC1031 was not found to be correlated with hENT/hCTN, dCK or CDA transcript levels. Gemcitabine and NUC1031 showed equivalent efficacy in a CDA-high PDX model in vivo contradicting the primary rationale of NUC1031 design.

Conclusion: NUC1031 did not exhibit evidence of superior activity over gemcitabine, as a single-agent, or in combination with cisplatin, in either our in vivo or in vitro BTC models. Given that the largest Phase 3 study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT0314666) to date in BTC is underway (N = 828) comparing NUC1031/cisplatin to gemcitabine/cisplatin, our results suggest that a more conservative clinical evaluation path would be more appropriate.

Keywords: Cholangiocarcinoma; Cisplatin; Gemcitabine; Phosphoramidate; Pro-drug.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. de Groen PC, Gores GJ, LaRusso NF et al (1999) Biliary tract cancers. N Engl J Med 341:1368–1378. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199910283411807 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Van Dyke AL, Shiels MS, Jones GS et al (2019) Biliary tract cancer incidence and trends in the United States by demographic group, 1999–2013. Cancer 125:1489–1498. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.31942 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Ghidini M, Pizzo C, Botticelli A et al (2018) Biliary tract cancer: current challenges and future prospects. Cancer Manag Res 11:379–388. https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S157156 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Njei B (2014) Changing pattern of epidemiology in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Hepatology 60:1107–1108. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.26958 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Razumilava N, Gores GJ (2015) Building a staircase to precision medicine for biliary tract cancer. Nat Genet 47:967–968. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3386 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources