Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring: Still a Mystery More Than Half a Century Later

Affiliations

Comment

Barry S Schifrin. Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Jun.

. 2020 Jun;135(6):1487-1488.

doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003914.

No abstract available

Comment in

In Reply.
Andrews WW, Tita ATN. Andrews WW, et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Jun;135(6):1488. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003915. Obstet Gynecol. 2020. PMID: 32443073 No abstract available.

Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring: Still a Mystery More Than Half a Century Later.
Andrews WW, Tita ATN. Andrews WW, et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Feb;135(2):469-471. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003674. Obstet Gynecol. 2020. PMID: 31923077 Review. No abstract available.

1. Andrews WW, Tita ATN. Fetal heart rate monitoring: still a mystery more than half a century later. Obstet Gynecol 2020;135:469–71.
1. Macones GA, Hankins GD, Spong CY, Hauth J, Moore T. The 2008 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop report on electronic fetal monitoring: update on definitions, interpretation, and research guidelines. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2008;37:510–5.
1. Cahill AG, Roehl KA, Odibo AO, Macones GA. Association and prediction of neonatal acidemia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;207:206.e1–8.
1. Executive summary: Neonatal encephalopathy and neurologic outcome, second edition. Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Task Force on Neonatal Encephalopathy. Obstet Gynecol 2014;123:896–901.
1. Frey HA, Liu X, Lynch CD, Musindi W, Samuels P, Rood KM, et al. An evaluation of fetal heart rate characteristics associated with neonatal encephalopathy: a case-control study. BJOG 2018;125:1480–7.