Decline in Carbon Monoxide Transfer Coefficient in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- PMID: 32443426
- PMCID: PMC7290811
- DOI: 10.3390/jcm9051512
Decline in Carbon Monoxide Transfer Coefficient in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Abstract
Background: Although a reduced carbon monoxide transfer coefficient (Kco) is an important feature in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), how it changes over time and its relationship with other clinical outcomes remain unclear. This study evaluated longitudinal changes in Kco and their relationship with other clinical outcomes.
Methods: We evaluated patients with COPD from the Korean Obstructive Lung Disease cohort, followed up for up to ten years. Random coefficient models were used to assess the annual change in Kco over time. Participants were categorized into tertiles according to Kco decline rate. Baseline characteristics and outcomes, including changes in FEV1 and emphysema index, incidence of exacerbations, and mortality, were compared between categories.
Results: A decline in Kco was observed in 92.9% of the 211 enrolled participants with COPD. Those with the most rapid decline (tertile 1) had a lower FEV1/FVC% (tertile 1: 43.8% ± 9.7%, tertile 2: 46.4% ± 10.5%, tertile 3: 49.2% ± 10.4%, p = 0.008) and a higher emphysema index at baseline (27.7 ± 14.8, 22.4 ± 16.1, 18.1 ± 14.5, respectively, p = 0.001). Tertile 3 showed a lower decline rate in FEV1 (16.3 vs. 27.1 mL/yr, p = 0.017) and a lower incidence of exacerbations (incidence rate ratio = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.44-0.99) than tertile 1. There were no differences in the change in emphysema index and mortality between categories.
Conclusion: Most patients with COPD experienced Kco decline over time, which was greater in patients with more severe airflow limitation and emphysema. Decline in Kco was associated with an accelerated decline in FEV1 and more frequent exacerbations; hence, this should be considered as an important outcome measure in further studies.
Keywords: carbon monoxide transfer coefficient; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; exacerbation; lung function decline.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures






References
-
- Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management and Prevention of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (2020 Report) [(accessed on 5 March 2020)]; Available online: https://goldcopd.org/gold-reports.
-
- Lozano R., Naghavi M., Foreman K., Lim S., Shibuya K., Aboyans V., Abraham J., Adair T., Aggarwal R., Ahn S.Y., et al. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380:2095–2128. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61728-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Eisner M.D., Anthonisen N., Coultas D., Kuenzli N., Perez-Padilla R., Postma D., Romieu I., Silverman E.K., Balmes J.R. Committee on Nonsmoking COPD. An official American Thoracic Society public policy statement: Novel risk factors and the global burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2010;182:693–718. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200811-1757ST. - DOI - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources