Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 May 20;9(2):17.
doi: 10.3390/antib9020017.

Combined Anti-Cancer Strategies Based on Anti-Checkpoint Inhibitor Antibodies

Affiliations
Review

Combined Anti-Cancer Strategies Based on Anti-Checkpoint Inhibitor Antibodies

Josée Golay et al. Antibodies (Basel). .

Abstract

Therapeutic monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of cancer came of age in 1997, with the approval of anti-CD20 Rituximab. Since then, a wide variety of antibodies have been developed with many different formats and mechanisms of action. Among these, antibodies blocking immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized the field, based on the novelty of their concept and their demonstrated efficacy in several types of cancer otherwise lacking effective immunotherapy approaches. ICI are expressed by tumor, stromal or immune cells infiltrating the tumor microenvironment, and negatively regulate anti-tumor immunity. Antibodies against the first discovered ICI, CTLA-4, PD-1 and PD-L1, have shown significant activity in phase III studies against melanoma and other solid cancers, alone or in combination with chemotherapy or radiotherapy. However, not all cancers and not all patients respond to these drugs. Therefore, novel antibodies targeting additional ICI are currently being developed. In addition, CTLA-4, PD-1 and PD-L1 blocking antibodies are being combined with each other or with other antibodies targeting novel ICI, immunostimulatory molecules, tumor antigens, angiogenic factors, complement receptors, or with T cell engaging bispecific antibodies (BsAb), with the aim of obtaining synergistic effects with minimal toxicity. In this review, we summarize the biological aspects behind such combinations and review some of the most important clinical data on ICI-specific antibodies.

Keywords: cancer; immune checkpoint inhibitors; microenvironment; therapeutic antibodies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflict of interest to report.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Major mechanisms of action of monoclonal and bispecific antibodies. Unconjugated IgG1 monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) work generally through activation of immune effector mechanisms through their Fc regions: (A) Antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) by NK cells and antibody-depndent phagocytosis (ADCP) by macrophages, (B) activation of the complement cascade. (C) T cell engaging bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) with or without Fc, act by binding a tumor antigen (TA) and CD3 on T cells (CD3 x TA). This induces activation of cytotoxic T cells which proliferate and kill the tumor cells. (D) Antibodies against immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) mostly block interaction of the ICI with their ligands, thus activating immune cells. This takes place via the Fab interaction with the ligand, blocking ICI function. In some cases, the MAbs may have a functional IgG1 Fc and eliminate ICI expressing cells through ADCC/ADCP or complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC). See also Table 1 for abbreviations.
Figure 2
Figure 2
MAb and BsAb structures. Structure of a standard IgG (A) and examples of BsAbs, either lacking Fc (B) or containing an Fc region (C).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mechanisms of antibody combinations. (A) Antibody combinations targeting two ICI, either as single MAbs or BsAbs. (B) Two MAbs targeting an ICI and a tumor antigen, these can also be combined in a BsAb format. (C) Combination of a MAb targeting an ICI with a TE BsAb and (D) an ICI antibody can be combined with MAbs blocking different pathways involved in tumor growth and metastasis, such as antibodies blocking angiogenic or growth factors, or complement factors and their receptors.

References

    1. Golay J. Direct targeting of cancer cells with antibodies: What can we learn from the successes and failure of unconjugated antibodies for lymphoid neoplasias? J. Autoimmun. 2017;85:6–19. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2017.06.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Weiner G.J. Building better monoclonal antibody-based therapeutics. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2015;15:361–370. doi: 10.1038/nrc3930. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Taylor R.P., Lindorfer M.A. Cytotoxic mechanisms of immunotherapy: Harnessing complement in the action of anti-tumor monoclonal antibodies. Semin. Immunol. 2016;28:309–316. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2016.03.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sedykh S.E., Prinz V.V., Buneva V.N., Nevinsky G.A. Bispecific antibodies: Design, therapy, perspectives. Drug Des. Devel. Ther. 2018;12:195–208. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S151282. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gajewski T.F., Schreiber H., Fu Y.-X. Innate and adaptive immune cells in the tumor microenvironment. Nat. Immunol. 2013;14:1014–1022. doi: 10.1038/ni.2703. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources